No, because of the way the media functions from the inside and its external influences.
2006-08-10 16:49:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by fslcaptain737 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The news coverage barely tells us anything. Today all I read and heard on the news was that airports are backed up because of a possible threat that was going on in England. They aren't allowing carry ons or sodas. But do they just not know anymore or are they not telling us?
2006-08-10 23:51:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by moocowjuice88 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes they said everything on TV don't you know that. LOL If they told us ahead of time they would ruin getting the guys involved. Why not wait until you've got the people involved and then tell the world of the terrorist plot. True heroes those secret police and FBI and Scotland Yard. We salute them all!! ;)
2006-08-10 23:52:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No we don't know the half of it I'm sure. It's normal though. That's why people that have been in wars don't talk about it.
2006-08-11 00:09:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eerin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes because I look to alternative sources like:
2006-08-10 23:52:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read stories that are slanted both ways. between the opinions their is a fact or two so yes.
2006-08-10 23:57:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by biggun4570 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
We are probably getting third hand information from a news agency who heard it from a reporter who heard it from some local etc...
2006-08-10 23:49:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by wado-kai 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes.... i feel like there's more the story.... i hate war :-(
2006-08-10 23:56:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by alwayzatemptation69 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, I try to ignore it I have enough stress with my meth head ex ---
2006-08-10 23:50:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
informed? heck i'm informed, reformed,deformed, uniformed
2006-08-11 00:01:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by kurleylovescheese 6
·
0⤊
0⤋