A firm which checks out books for honesty and accuracy claims "they found so many lie's in Coulters book they don't even know where to begin".
They even showed the claims she made in her book and then showed proof that she lied. Claims she made like classes in elementary school that teach sex education. She claimed she saw the article in the New York Times in 2000. They located that article and it said nothing of the sort.
These people claim their is hardly anything in her book they have found accurate.
Is she another nutcase lesbian neo-con who can't even lie good? Hell even Bush was able to con most of America into the Iraq war.
2006-08-10 16:03:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Don't worry Neo-Cons, we can just blame Bill Clinton.
2006-08-10 16:04:11 · update #1
Heres the countdown story. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/
2006-08-10 17:43:42 · update #2
Shes full of sh*t and I'm actually quite surprised that anybody (who isn't a diehard neocon) doesn't realize it.
People all over the place are exposing her bullsh*t for what it is.
Here's a good one for you:
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/08/ann_coulter_on_evolution_part_1/
2006-08-10 16:57:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets blame Bill Clinton for Ann Coulter.
2006-08-10 16:23:23 · answer #2 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ANN COULTER HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!! Nothing surprises me about this woman. she is a true Conservative through and through
Did a conservative president not send troops to Iraq based on false misrepresentations . Have the conservatives in america stolen 2 elections back to back. The entire conservative agenda is based on principles which have been used over and over again. The conservatives (Republicans) basic belief is to keep things as they are. Ann coulter is a moron (figuratively) and everyone knows that you can't sue an idiot
Basically if one believes Ann Coulter and anything she writes that person is guilty of pullling the wool over their own eyes.
2006-08-10 17:24:34 · answer #3 · answered by sonnyd 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The publishing of knowing falsehoods does not give rise to a suit at law unless someone has been defamed or can demonstrate justifiable reliance on, resulting in compensible money damages, those falsehoods. Coulter's punishment is public scorn and professional disgrace and reproval.
2006-08-10 16:20:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why someone would believe anything that comes from Coulter in the first place. Personally, I find her a crap spewing bigot who doesn't even respect her own right to vote. Would you trust anything from someone who would voluntarily pack up all of her belongings and take a trip back to the 18th Century?
2006-08-10 16:41:25 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well if some firm made those claims, they likely would post findings on the net. do you have a link to their address or are you making stuff up.
Ann says things that need to be said that many are too scared to say.
2006-08-10 16:38:36 · answer #6 · answered by Arthur M 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To the reference about the Clinton's. He only lies about sex and she only lies about liking sex. So what kind of lies have you told related to sex?
2006-08-10 16:36:38 · answer #7 · answered by Lou 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's awful, The Clinton's would NEVER lie !
Professional LIARS (both of them)
2006-08-10 16:17:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not suprised. She is a damn nut anyway, I can't believe anyone out there takes her seriously.
2006-08-10 16:15:34 · answer #9 · answered by Jennifer L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I want to read all her lies. am going to buy copy of her book tomorrow
2006-08-10 16:49:38 · answer #10 · answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋