I love this. Democrats can't believe this. The NSA program worked. I mean god forbid that a terroist plot be disrupted.
The record shows that the Democrats have no ground on national security and actually want the terrorists to have rights like at Club Gitmo.
The Kooks (Keepers of Odd Knowledge Society) are already making the theories about England. I love it.
Anyone think the Democrats are incredibly weak on national security?
I know the looneys will say wait till November...I've waited through 2000,2002,2004 and again 2006 shortly.
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/archives/003435.html
2006-08-10 13:53:37 · 11 answers · asked by John 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Beachbum has the typical liberal answer.
I hate to burst your bubble but history didn't begin the day we invaded Iraq. Good try though
2006-08-10 14:07:01 · update #1
Excellent observation, John!
2006-08-10 14:00:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think you should reread that article again and figure out just who wrote it and why it was written too before you start slamming the Democrats.
It's what I would gladly call a pile of poop written by the opposing team to make sure no one blames anything on Bush.
Remember what a pile of poop looks like? Find a picture of Bush and you can't help but see the biggest pile of poop in it.
They are saying that the Democrats want the terrorist to basically move right in next store to you or I, get real and see that it's all crap put there to scare the rest of the poop out of this country and for me it just didn't work because I for one know better.
Try spreading your manure else where.
2006-08-10 21:06:28 · answer #2 · answered by fedupmoma 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
1. Why is it a competition to you? You love that terrorists were trying to hurt us?
2. If Bush was not a madman then the terrorists would not hate us to the depth they do today.
3. What record? Republicans have control of all 3 branches.
4. If we were winning the war on terror, there would not have even been an attempt.
5. I am sure republicans were behind this attack anyways just to try to win political points before the November election.
6. To follow your argument, wasn't it BUSH SR that walked out and left Iraq untouched in 1990?
2006-08-10 20:59:41 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Beachdumbs answer is just what Americans will see in the Dems come November. Its scary that people can be so naive and idiotic.
2006-08-10 21:10:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm just anxious to hear what sort of theories they're going to make up. Do you think that idiot Bush master-minded this to take people's minds off of Iraq? Pleaaassseeee!
2006-08-10 21:02:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, the record shows that they want the US government to follow the law.
There is nothing the government is doing that can't be done within the law. Our Commander-in-Sheik just prefers to ignore the law because he things it doesn't apply to him.
2006-08-10 21:04:49 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
you care more about "beating the democrats" than the security of our country...
IT'S NOT A GAME... HUMAN LIVES ARE AT RISK AND IT'S TIME TO START TREATING IT WITH THE RESPECT IT DESERVES...
2006-08-10 21:05:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Beach Bum hit the nail on the head! Great post!
2006-08-10 21:10:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
incredibly weak on security!
2006-08-10 21:07:15 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think the Dems are weak on National Security.
2006-08-10 20:59:42 · answer #10 · answered by First Lady 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋