English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If John Kerry was in office now instead of Bush I figure the terrorist in England would not have been caught. Bush is strong on terror and the best thing for this country. Kerry would have destroyed the military and intelligence organizations that did such a great job in capturing the terrorist before they acted. Don't you think its time you Bush Wackers reconsider your left wing appeasement agendas now?

2006-08-10 13:43:41 · 21 answers · asked by T 3 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Good question but they wont

2006-08-10 13:51:28 · answer #1 · answered by Uh-huh 2 · 3 2

Check out BBC news it's on C-Span. None of this is truth. All fiction. John Kerry would not have taken us to war for no good reason, John Kerry has a brain unlike Bush who has no clue. Bin Laden is in Afghanistan not Iraq, Kerry knows that. John Kerry also served his country, unlike Bush and Cheney who are both draft dodgers.
The 24 Terrorist that were in the UK also were not in Iraq. Also what happen to your "we have not been attacked since Sept 11th." propaganda machine? Un like the USA who allows 30 million ilegals to walk into America over the border, the UK knows how to protect it's public. We know the problem and we know how to fix it. All polls taken say Incumbents are toast.

2006-08-10 21:07:23 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 3 0

I cheer Bush's agressive way of dealing with terrorists, that is the only way to stop those ***holes. But He needs to learn to attack with small elite forces. He is wacking His own dick in Iraq. The Iraq war is a huge waste of money and military that could have been put to better use. Kerry may have used His brain, instead of acting like a big oil greedy Cowboy. How do You know unless You gave Kerry a chance.

2006-08-10 21:03:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 2 2

What did President Bush have to do with catching terrorist in England?

From what I'm hearing this was done by the British independent of any help from the USA.

And I feel sorry for you that you are so short sighted that you truly believe that any American President, regardless of party affiliation would do anything to harm this country.

2006-08-10 20:50:52 · answer #4 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 6 1

So nice of you Americans to help out little old England. We could never have found these nasty terrorists without your help .... or should I say typical self important, egotistical American fool.

Earlier this week I answered the question below.

'What differentiates America from the rest of the world?'

My answer was:
An overblown opinion of self worth.
An inability to accept they might be wrong.
Insular.
and so on...

Your question just proves my point.

In answer to the more general point of your question. The policies of the current US administration and previous ones on the issue of the Middle East have at best been confused and at worse been anti-muslim. The level of terrorism currently in the world is in part due to the pro Israeli stance of most western government. In my humble opinion we (UK, US and others) should remove ourselves from the Arab world and allow them to kill each other until they reach a point where they either sort out their own problems or they have wiped each other out.

Give them no targets.

'Sometimes when I look deep in your eyes, I swear I can see you soul.'

2006-08-10 21:06:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

How can you give bush credit??? The plot was unearthed BY THE BRITS!!! If it had been left to bush to catch them, the sky would have looked like the Fourth of July with exploding airplanes! Hell, he's been looking for Bin Laden for 5 years & still isn't any closer to catching him. Facts are like kryptonite to a republican!

2006-08-10 21:03:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Only people that worry about America and their safety first rather than their political agenda's would agree with you.

2006-08-10 20:57:56 · answer #7 · answered by question212 6 · 2 0

I think he is still a coke snorting, alcoholic, immoral person that steals elections. That is how I feel about George Bush, I would like to know just exactly how you know what John Kerry or Al Gore would have done. Are you clairvoyant or just guessing.

2006-08-10 20:51:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

They would both have the same agenda. They were both in Skull and Bones. The government controls the president not the president controls the government. Either way America is screwed.

2006-08-10 20:48:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

hum let me see i think it was bushes lap dog ,tony blair that told bush about the plot to blow up those airplanes. but i can see those political ads now VOTE REPUB OR YOUR ALL DEAD, the new willie horton ads to get us all scared.as far as bush is concerned he has set our foreign policy back to the stone age.hasnt any body told bush to stop sleeping with the enemy !!!

2006-08-10 23:09:26 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 2 1

1. I bet you could not name one piece of legislation that Kerry ever supported.

2. Bush has created more terrorists(ni terms of ppl who hate America) by his actions than ever could have been imagined.

2006-08-10 20:50:37 · answer #11 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers