2006-08-10 13:30:27 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
What I was saying was that if you believe in Creationism then you're basing that on Biblical evidence, but still, in the end we just have no idea how it all went down. If you don't believe in evolution because of its questionable evidence then you can't necessarily believe in Creationism.
2006-08-10 14:46:20 · update #1
Oh, and thanks for the insults. They were wonderful.
2006-08-10 14:49:53 · update #2
so you're saying ppl who believe in creationism are more gullible than ppl who believe in evolution? i agree.
2006-08-17 04:35:12 · answer #1 · answered by yofatcat1 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wikipedia
2006-08-18 05:41:19 · answer #2 · answered by rod 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? Are you implying O.J. wasn't innocent? He's got such an honest face, as well as good lawyers.
As for Creationism, what's wrong with believing in something no matter how silly or far fetched? It's only as silly as believing in Evolution just because all the facts point towards it being correct and verifiable.
2006-08-10 20:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by Mesper 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are to many variables when considering creationism. The element of its understanding is based on faith. If you're seriously comparing the circumstances between believeing the one-sided account of a felony and the doctrined ever conservative radical accounts of an apparent christian belief which was based on a motive not purely without substance then perhaps sarcastically speaking one cannot determine fact from fiction.
2006-08-10 20:44:16 · answer #4 · answered by Evasive tactics 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Creationism and evolution are both theories. In science everything is theories, nothing is proven untill its disproven by facts and evidence. There is evidence that the earth is older than 7 thousand years, but is there evidence that god did not have a hand in evolution? So, untill we can prove that there is no god, both theories are valid.
2006-08-17 20:25:09 · answer #5 · answered by jennypjd 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your right about about that last thing, yes if you dont believe in creationism it doenst mean you believe in evolution or vise versa. There isnt scientific evidence for creationism that is for sure. Scientists know evolution happends, they can see it in microscopes and deduce it by observing our genetics. Scientists are simply debating over how it happends or what are the factors of its occurence.
2006-08-11 01:53:16 · answer #6 · answered by adrianchemistry 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hardly. The civil case against him, the success of which turned on the jury believing OJ actually committed murder, did go against him.
Sigh, the implicit insult in this question--that you have to be a moron to question the dictum of the religion Evolution and its Great Prophet, Charles Darwin--grows tiresome, you know it? Even when serious scientific questions are raised, including ones based on sound mathematical analysis (as I have done more than once in YAHOO answers), the questions are brushed aside as moronic, not because they are not valid questions, but because they question the Great Religion, Evolution.
If this analysis offends you, then consider that your question is equally offensive to those who, for serious scientific reasons, do not feel evolution as it is currently constituted, is tenable on a large scale.
2006-08-10 20:47:24 · answer #7 · answered by gandalf 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sheesh. Gandalf: "those who, for serious scientific reasons, do not feel evolution as it is currently constituted, is tenable on a large scale."
For your God's sake at least accept that your belief is based only on faith. There is no-one who does not believe in evolution for "serious scientific reasons". Not a single member of the National Academy of Sciences is a creationist or gives any credence to Intelligent Design Theory (sic).
PS please don't bring these people here. it pollutes the biology section. it's better to creationist-bait in R&S where these people belong...
2006-08-11 04:24:29 · answer #8 · answered by the last ninja 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I must agree with David on this. Creationism is, of course, nonsense, but O. J.'s innocence is at least possible. (The business of the glove always seemed to me to be a cheap frame-up.)
2006-08-10 20:36:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you believe in Evolution, does that mean you believe that Islamo-fascists are the next improvement to the species?
My question is as ridiculous as yours!
2006-08-10 20:45:54 · answer #10 · answered by Karl the Webmaster 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋