if so tell me what you thought about it.
2006-08-10 12:30:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Popular Mechanics is coming out with a book called "Debunking 9/11 Myths".
This is POPULAR MECHANICS!
NOT the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy Weekly magazine.
You people need to stop listening to people who believe in Roswell and Area 51 and wake up.
2006-08-10 12:43:13 · answer #1 · answered by Mortis 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i am going to in straightforward words say that predicting that there could be an attack of a few style does no longer precisely make the guy Nostradamus,and it would not even help if he mentions the WTC fantastically because it were a objective contained in the previous,and so a options as western objectives it makes suited experience. i am going to say this I actually have listened to each of the conspiracy stuff in this,watched the flicks again and again and that i ought to admit that I actually have intense reservations about no longer in straightforward words what the authorities.knew in boost,or in the adventure that they did,and who fullyyt replaced into in touch. i have watched the flicks more effective at present of the towers coming down and there is completely the stink of managed demolition surrounding it. anybody can say what they are going to yet i have considered managed demo,hell all persons have quicker or later and that is precisely what evidently like. To believe the stresses led to with the help of the fireplace could reason various flooring to provide at round similar time and reason a pancaking effect is a probability,yet two times interior an similar adventure? the percentages of that are spectacular to say the least. And one ingredient keeps coming back to me,the planes hit the perimeters of the towers at intense speed exploding upon impact,there is very much of mass in touch so a number of it makes all of it a thanks to the different area,yet their will be vastly more effective harm on one area than different so why no longer even the slightest lean contained in the fall of the progression? would not the more effective badly damaged structure on one area provide to emphasise of fireplace more effective rapidly,seems in a position to me. regrettably the mathematics concerned about such an equation is a lot above my pay grade.
2016-11-24 19:15:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't know that C-SPAN carried fantasy programs.
2006-08-10 13:25:47 · answer #3 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
9/11 cover up? thats stupid.
2006-08-10 12:46:03 · answer #4 · answered by Ah Ha 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just more proof probably. What do people need? A confession??
2006-08-10 12:34:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
i have seen the other documentaries. and i believe them.
2006-08-10 12:34:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋