when the U.S. attacked the effect and no the cause?
2006-08-10 12:15:03 · 6 answers · asked by hawkeyes 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
when the U.S. attacked the effect and not the cause?
2006-08-10 12:18:02 · update #1
wow no one knows what i'm talking about.
2006-08-10 12:26:26 · update #2
When did the US attack Lebanon???
2006-08-10 12:21:20 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Lebanon, the cause is Hezbollah. The effect is the current conflict. So, the Lebanese government is currently fighting the effect and not the cause.
In Iraq, the cause is the US invasion. The effect is the US invasion. And the US isn't doing much about either.
2006-08-10 19:24:12 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And what in your opinion is the cause? We are confronting the causes a bit at a time on all fronts. Its a tedious task especially when Bush and us are the only ones who have the balls and will to try and get what needs to be done done. Sitting and doing nothing or establishing silly cease fires only holds thing off for so long.
2006-08-10 19:23:53 · answer #3 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the effect would be to attack there own government for not having balls enough to protect them from hezbollah in the first place....
2006-08-10 19:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't personally care what the animals do. Stop giving them ammo!
2006-08-10 19:21:21 · answer #5 · answered by SVern 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what? speak english.
2006-08-10 19:18:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋