Would the world be a safer place withe removal of Bush and Blaire?

Answer 1

The entire world stands to gain by the removal of Bush from office.

Billions and billions of lives are in the hands of the village idiot.


What has happended is this proposterous myth that the left wouldn't fight terrorism. This is the ludicours on fact and face.

Bush has used this as a power grab....

Answer 2

Not really !! They will just change the puppets !

The "Big Octopus" is deeply manipulating all levels of society,

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Answer 3

No, it would be safer with the removal of all the nutcase mulims trying to bomb everything in the west.

When are you people going to realise, we are already at war. Israel is the start, if they are defeated it will be the next western target after that. Has anyone ever asked why these people bomb Israel? It's because they are trying to wipe them out! The is what Hitler tried.

Iran, and all the other fanatical muslims want to re-instate the old territories of the mulim empire, which includes Spain. They hate the west, they think our values are evil, they think democracy is evil! They bomb shools and burn down other religions buildings.

Bush and blair do bad things, but it's always as a response! They didn't start all this.

The sooner a nuke is dropped on Palestine, Iran & Syria, the sooner the world can have peace.

Answer 4

No it would not be a safer place, because what put these two sub-humans in power is the same force that will keep other like-minded boils on the skin of humanity in place!
These two mass murderers are only the puppets.
If you do not own, you do not control
So long as the resources of the world are in the hands of a (relatively ) small minority of people who essentially dictate how things are done (multi national companies and their associated industrial and financial hangers on) then we will continue to have war criminals running so called democratic political institutions like 10 Downing Street and the White House!
The removal of such political figures will not change things, and neither will placing your mark on a piece of paper every few years for that matter!!!!
We need a revolution and we need it NOW!!!!

Answer 5

Hear! hear!
"Actually the world is much safer because of Bush and Blaire. There are many out there today that believe like Neville Chamberlain did during the build up to WWII, that it would never affect England. Winston Churchill tried to raise the flag of warning in regards to Germany for years and they all thought he was over reacting. He wasn't, and millions died because they didn't believe him. I believe Bush and Blair. I trust them."

Answer 6

No, The world would be a safer place withe the removal of Al-Quda, The Taliban & all other terrorists - think about it!

Answer 7

Surely no. Without them, there will still be some other people doing the same things for power, for their own will, for their own benefit or for their own purposes.

But this fact is not an excuse for any wrongdoing done by them.

Finally, the world would not be a safer place now & then, unless all people on earth agree to only one idealogy, religon or belief.

Answer 8

Actually the world is much safer because of Bush and Blaire. There are many out there today that believe like Neville Chamberlain did during the build up to WWII, that it would never affect England. Winston Churchill tried to raise the flag of warning in regards to Germany for years and they all thought he was over reacting. He wasn't, and millions died because they didn't believe him. I believe Bush and Blair. I trust them.

Answer 9

Since George Bush wants to fight wars for oil and Tony Blair is going to be his go to man, then I don't think either of them should remain in office. I think that the world will never be a safe place until all mankind can learn to respect each other.

Answer 10

Yea, but it depends on who the new leaders will be. If they're also selfish bastards than the world isn't safe. All this terrorist and wars stuff started when Bush took office. Blair is just simply Bush's ***** supporting him for everything he does.