As I heard on the news, they said you cannot bring toothpaste, deodorant, and other liquids when crossing the line.
2006-08-10 11:44:49 · 21 answers · asked by Malcolm uses Xbox 360 Avatar 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
That's stupid.
2006-08-10 11:48:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think so. I think at some point inconvenience outweighs safety.... and I think that more behind the scenes efforts should keep be made to make sure there are no terror plots or that they are thwarted before they happen, but to prevent people from bringing any liquids on an airplane is just ridiculous... I mean in this case it is not since there is an imminent threat, or intelligence of this kind of threat... but in the absence of this intelligence I think that it is sort of pointless. I think the intelligence is the key, not more security measures on the general population.
2006-08-10 11:51:01 · answer #2 · answered by Stephanie S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes because there are some liquid substances can be used as a dangerous weapon. The airport and airplane can give away complimentary beverages and you can take anything else you need in your checked-in luggage. The only exception should be food or milk for infants or medications.
2006-08-10 11:58:23 · answer #3 · answered by Debbie B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely until they are able to detect it through a screening process which is not going to happen as quickly as they will lift the ban.
If it is possible today what makes them think that they won't wait a month or 2.
I travel 2-3 times per month for business and would prefer to be slightly inconvenienced then at risk.
2006-08-10 11:50:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - but I think Bush ought to be permanently prohibited from entering this country, and stirring the pot like that. I don't believe that anyone "cracked" an Al Qaeda plot, only that the politicians want to keep support for the war alive. Idiots.
2006-08-10 11:49:26 · answer #5 · answered by kentata 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe that over time the threat that exists today will diminish, but for - and maybe for quite some time to come - may as well keep the liquids/gels out of planes.
2006-08-10 11:51:33 · answer #6 · answered by WhiteLilac1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it rather is genuine. they got here upon liquid explosive chemical ingredients. you need to purchase drinks once you conflict via protection. you nevertheless can not take on the plane the two. i might extremely be thirsty than blown up. with any luck the protection will make even stricter regulations. Like I suggested, i might extremely be inconvenienced than lifeless. do no longer be responsive to approximately you however.
2016-12-14 03:59:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes indeed, it needs to be prohibited. However, i would like the airline authorities to provide all the prohibited facility themselves. Prevention is always better than the Cure. And after all, its for our safety and security. Thus, it needs to be banned.
2006-08-10 11:54:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think they shoud be banned from taking on planes in handluggage beacause you can buy drinks on the plane but not the AIRPORT you could be delayed for like 12 hours and poeple need to drink. and all there is in most airports it coffee shops and cafes anyways lol
2006-08-10 11:53:13 · answer #9 · answered by Louise-Rose 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just love how they're taking bottled water away from people, yet the plane itself is carrying thousands of pounds of jet fuel.
2006-08-10 11:50:25 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because you can put them in your checked luggage. It's only in your carry-on bag that you cannot have liquids.
2006-08-10 11:53:01 · answer #11 · answered by Doctor Hand 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋