Now before you closed minded folks start bashing me for the question, watch the recent CNN Lou Dobbs video on this link:
http://canadawantsthetruth911.blogspot.com/
This was aired last night.
And don't forget, when you call me an idiot, there are also victim's families that think something is amiss with the government.
2006-08-10
11:07:02
·
28 answers
·
asked by
sherry001fun
2
in
News & Events
➔ Other - News & Events
Oh yes, the popular Mechanics report. That would have been a great report if it wasn't so tainted by Cheyney's cousin.
And this comment...
"Nothing will make be believe that what happened on 9/11 was an inside job. Absolutely nothing."
What kind of closed minded person are you? So if the REAL proof is presented one day, this person will still NOT believe it.
Now who is the idiot???
2006-08-10
11:17:32 ·
update #1
Sorry, it was Cheroff's cousin, Not Cheynets.. Stupid me for that one..
2006-08-10
11:19:13 ·
update #2
And do NOT forget, all you American's have LESS rights now than before Bush was in charge.
2006-08-10
11:21:16 ·
update #3
i honestly dont think it was but hey they do make an interesting argument. im always open minded so there is always that possibility that it was in fact an inside job. i dont think we'll ever know the truth
2006-08-10 11:13:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by dirty n 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
Most likely. The kind of expertise required to grab 4 airliners in the same timeframe, get through or disable all of the various security screens, and co-ordinate flying a jetliner down the Hudson towards Manhattan, all point to an "inside job". Not to mention the fact that the Pentagon is probably the most secured building in the world and has its own defenses. The standard MO is that when a plane violates the airspace around the White House, etc. jets are scrambled to force it down. Andrews AFB is pretty darn close to the Pentagon, yet no jets were scrambled.
A similar kind of operation was attempted under JFK -- some general wanted to shoot down a civilian plane deliberately, and then blame it on Cuba. JFK nixed it.
Obviously, this administration, especially Cheney, wanted some "emergency", to try to seize power, very similar to what the Nazis did around the Reichstag Fire.
2006-08-10 13:40:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joya 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
9/11 was a staged propaganda incedent.
9/11 was the New Pearl Harbor and Osama is the patsy, IF he was involved, which I SERIOUSLY doubt.
If you look at the video of Osama when he admits to 9/11, its NOT HIM. the face is too short, he's like 5'9" and DARK.
In every other video before 9/11 and several after, Osama is over 6' tall has a long face (because he's so damn tall) and is not dark. In several videos, he DENIES having anything to do w/ 9/11 and states that it was a US GOVERNMENT OPERATION.
And yes the US government WOULD kill 300 citizens. they have done it before, as long as they can gain more power and money.
WAIT Lou Dobbs is a LIBERAL!!!????
Please share your stash, dude! That must be some GOOD dope.
flyin2myhome:
NO, that would be the British gov't. we're not the only ones who use lies and fear to manipulate citizens into supporting the neverending war. This is OLD and WORLDWIDE. It is how rulers (not prestidents, the REAL rulers) stay in power.
2006-08-10 11:43:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by kevin g 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ever heard of the late Fred Dibnah? He was a demolition expert. He showed us in his TV series, in detail and well before 9/11, how to demolish large buildings that were no longer wanted, such as old industiral chimneys and apartment blocks. He also showed us exactly what a building looks like when it is going down because it has been demolished by careful planning and placement of explosives. Despite the shock of seeing the planes on 9/11 and all the other horror, it was even more of a shock to see those buildings descend in just the manner shown to us by Fred Dibnah. I wonder if anyone else noticed this. I am NOT suggesting that dear old Fred Dibnah had anything to do with 9/11, just in case someone thought that was what I was saying.
2006-08-10 11:17:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by mutaali t 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'll answer the question at face value. I didn't look at the address. Too, I think most people would agree but are afraid to say so. Without a doubt it was an indside job.
I've become aware of this late in life. I'm fifty two, now. Take a look around you. Noboby makes a move unless they're moving in a column of either cars, or people on foot for mutual security long before 9/11. That's not normal.
Why?
Because people do evil things.
They know there's a payback. So they figure in numbers there's strength.
I look at it like; when you serve evil, you become instantly expendable to it.
It's been rough on me, but nowhere near as much compared to the rest. I don't believe in ' joiining up. '
Talk about living in fear!
Boy have they got good and deserved reason to!
2006-08-10 11:16:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by vanamont7 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I congratulate you for being open minded about this. The evidence supporting this is nothing short of monumental, I assure you. If you really want the whole truth about this, check out web sites such as davidicke.com, or rense.com. They are not main stream, and not afraid to post real solid evidence about stuff like this. I honestly do believe that there is an ongoing mega-conspiracy at the very highest levels of government. I honestly fear either another catastrophic terrorist attack here in America, or an all out world war 3, maybe both, in the near future. Wait and see if I'm right, or not.
2006-08-10 11:21:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by oceansoflight777 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
properly 911 substitute right into a style chosen because of the fact it would be common to remember for emergencies, to correspond with different numbers used for tips which contain 411. in case you recommend 9/11, then do you extremely have self belief that a central authority that could screw up so badly in Iraq and not additionally be shiny adequate to plant phony WMD's there could be the comparable ones who might desire to orchestrate certainly one of these complicated plot as an interior 9/11 conspiracy might require? extremely?
2016-11-04 07:44:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All that was amiss was the times the planes crashed. Maybe they have a good reson for saying that. And what makes you think the news isnt just lying and the people who wrote the book. I mean who will make the money when the book is sold?
2006-08-10 11:14:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by I can't think of a Good nick 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I didn't hear anything in the video that says there was anything like an inside job. All it says is that one hand of the Gov. doesn't know what the other hand is doing and none of them want to take the blame. Its been like that for decades.
2006-08-10 11:20:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by David T 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
The airline plot uncovered the other day by the British Government. The one where terrorist were trying to smuggle liquid explosives aboard flights into America. I would assume you probably think the U.S government was in on that one too.
2006-08-10 11:29:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Are you watching the news right now? Do you still think it was an inside job? Anyone can put a twisted spin on any subject to make you agree with them. Too bad we are that gullible. Nothing will make be believe that what happened on 9/11 was an inside job. Absolutely nothing.
2006-08-10 11:12:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by Emm 6
·
2⤊
4⤋