English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When faced with survival, it matters not how well you recite leftist talking points, you have only one boolean choice, fight or flight.

Islamists continue to attack and are clear about their intentions. Most Americans continue to deny the scope of the attack and the existance of the enemy.

Whether we point fingers at each other or not, makes no difference, the war continues and with each succesful or unsuccessful attack, Islamists learn...they dont change their intent, they simply recalibrate and try to improve their efficiency.

Bin Laden said "once they left Somolia i realized America didnt have the stomach to fight, thats when I decided to go after them directly." When I first heard this, as a red-blood patriotic alpha american male, I yelled aloud "just you wait Bin Laden, you idiot".

I was the idiot. He was right. The left controls the important institutions (media & schools) and as a result, collectively, we have joined histories 'weak kneed' fools...

2006-08-10 10:25:34 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

We only seem that way because the weak liberals in America won't let us launch our nukes. If we launch, we will end this nonsense. We ended a war and started a peaceful time for a while. We need to use our weapons. Iran is the rightful target right now. They support every Islamic terrorist group out there. There should be no reason for this to continue happening.

2006-08-10 10:31:21 · answer #1 · answered by RAR24 4 · 0 4

There's an important line between self defense and war-mongering. We could have found Bin-Laden by now but decided to distract ourselves with a weak enemy unrelated to the fight. The scope of the attack is pot shots at civilians- Bin Laden is the weak kneed fool. You can pick a fight with a man your size, or you can attack his kids. Bin Laden went for the kids. He'd rather make "statements" in the form of thousands of civilian lives than fight an army on open ground. Now his "statements" are made for him by our own government, because keeping people afraid of terrorists is a convenient way to control the gullible element of our population. We don't actually need terrorists anymore, their work is being thoroughly done for them.

2006-08-10 10:38:34 · answer #2 · answered by Beardog 7 · 2 1

are you drunk??? or on dope???
your entire question and details are worthless. the left doesn't control nothing. if you truly think that the media is liberal you must be blind.
and bin laden never said that but even if he did.
you are too dumb too blind to know the facts of WHY those Muslims decided to have war with the US. it's not because they hate our FREEDOM ( that's if we are really that free ) and it's not because they are jealous of us coz we have trees and lawn like some of the morons here say.
our government put us in danger when they decided to dominate the Muslim world for their own benefits.
the US has been in the middle east since the early 90s. people over there dont like that and they have every right what da hell are we doing there any ways we've been there for 16 years now, allover the middle east not just Saudi Arabia!!!
we've been supporting Israel ever since its existence.
we support the illegal occupation of Palestine and the neighboring countries, we support this genocide committed by the Israeli army.
we aid them with the latest weapons which are being used to kill the Arabs.
if you are not old enough to have lived through those events go read a history book.
and what about Iraq??!!! 200,000 innocent were killed if not more for what???!!!!! you tell me what is the reason for this war?
if we stop being hypocrites it will make a huge difference and may be then they will stop trying to punish our government by killing innocent civilians.

2006-08-10 10:50:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

You are a bit misguided in your rants.

You also are suffering from selective memory.

You attribute, the failures of the adminstration that took power in 2000 and the congress which solidified its power 1994 as being absolved of any responsibility.

instead you say leftist. that makes you a) dishonest b) untrustworthy in this discussion.

You also pose the only option of Fight or Flight.
which is completely a false choice.

You also want to claim that by determining real accountablity no progress or problems in our sysem won't bring a better more effective system or government. let alone responsive.

this question or statment rather is a false choice of a real complicated prevention of terrorist acts on our country.

the real question is whether terror should be treated as a military action vs a law enforcement and intellgence question...

what you state is just halabalooo

2006-08-10 10:35:28 · answer #4 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 2 1

We can blow away entire nations, without Nuclear weapons, we have MOABs. 22,000lb conventional smart bombs with nuke blast power but NO radiation.

M…..Mother
O…..of
A…..all
B…..bombs

WE have Tomahawks with fuel-air explosive war heads. The big Tomahawks can carry 10 war heads. They can burn entire cities with fuel-air explosive.

First the MOAB, when the shock wave clears, in comes the Tomahawk. The entire city is flattened and then burned with fuel-air explosive. The fuel-air explosive burns everything left and it burns off all the oxygen. There is no way to survive!

With our satellites we can target every Arab city in any terrorist nation, and then lock them all into a firing solution. Then at 3am any morning the order was given, every Arab city targeted could be blown clean off the face of the Earth, all at the same time.

We could land our troops 30 minutes later and own the entire nation. There wouldn’t even be anyone left to shoot at our soldiers. The only thing that would be left are giant smoking holes in the sand. Maybe then the other nations would say “ What ever you do don’t piss off the Americans! They can blow away our whole nation with the push of a button, just like they did to those stupid Arabs!” Maybe being “ Dust in the Wind” would stop all stupid BS America bashing. At least to our face, what they to themselves behind our backs doesn’t matter.

2006-08-10 11:02:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

According to Professor Hegel Dialectical process the USA must have an enemy to fight and the most easy enemy are the Muslims they are far essayer than China or north Kora. Some country must kick the USA out of world power sooner or later

2006-08-10 10:48:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No, Americans are not too weak. Unfortunately, our current administration side-tracked us with Iraq....instead of going after our real enemy, Al-Queda.
They were not in Iraq at the time. And very few people had a problem with us going into Afghanistan, where their training camps were located. Whether on the right, or the left.
If we had continued with the original goal, you wouldn't see nearly the amount of dissension, that you see today.
And I noticed that you said Islamists, not extremists or terrorist groups.....was it your intent to indicate that we should wipe every Muslim off the face of the earth?

2006-08-10 10:46:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

This is insane. Most people do not understand that the main reason " terrorists" want to attack America is because of America's foreign policy in the middle east(which is very biased towards Israel) and also because of the invasion of Iraq.

http://pewresearch.org/obdeck/?ObDeckID=39

Did a single "terrorist" threaten Japan, France, or Spain?

2006-08-10 10:40:45 · answer #8 · answered by Mohammed R 4 · 1 1

Yes !!! But only politically. If it wasn't for politics we would be dropping bombs on Iran and Syria. They support, pay, give weapons and man power to the largest terror groups in the world.
Ending this would put a hug halt on the ability of terror groups such as Hezbollah, and all the rest.

But we would be killing thousands of innocents in the process. Well worth it if you ask me! But that would be a big no no for the liberals and there for we are forces to act defensively and use our troops a police officers rather than soldiers.

But rest assure when the enemy gives us a big enough kick in the ***, the **** will hit the fan!!!

Guess 9/11 wasn't big enough

2006-08-10 10:34:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I was reading some answers and It's amazing how for some people is easy to write about launching bombs overseas, killing thousand of innocent people, in order to kill the bunch of people link with terrorist. As if that will end the problem. Why is that is OK to kill innocent people there?? It is really necessary to kill thousands (and all the terrible consequences that last a life time after a nuclear explosion) in order to kill a few terrorist??

2006-08-10 10:50:12 · answer #10 · answered by carolina n 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers