Is CENSORSHIP a crime against Human Rights wherever it occurs?

Question

Hitler censored by burning books, chat rooms and yahoo censors material and many sites on the internet are censored. We are censored in what we can say and print every day - are the laws that censor us in themselves a crime against human rights

Answer 1

yes- censorship is on the increase. I am british, but have always admired the american people's defence of the freedom of speech. I was dismayed at the introduction of the patriot act on the heels of the twin towers catastrophe that could limit the publics ability to speak freely without fear of retribution. The vast majority of people who try to live as decently as they can naturally censor things that offend the moral values they hold as dear, and it is right that yahoo has an abuse facility so that if many people are objecting then there may be legitimate cause for concern. I think it is very biased. The word nig... is automatically (and quite rightly) banned, but honky is not. Logic would suggest that there are many offensive words depending on a persons point of view, and therefore censorship by its very nature is biased to the viewpoint of the persons with the power to censor. Censorship can influence the majority for good or ill depending on the political goals of the time. Protecting young people from explicit material in my opinion isn't censorship, but exercising a duty of care towards vulnerable minds. For adults, there should be no censorship especially in the context of current events and news.

Bleeping out one or two words is pointless as contraversial views will still be made. fuckin hell!

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

You're mixing government action and private action.

Yahoo is a private company. Nobody is requiring you to be here. But by agreeing to Yahoo's posting policies, you consented to whatever restrictions they place on content.

This has nothing to do with government censorship. You can't just opt-out of participating in the country. So government restrictions are a lot worse than voluntary private posting policies.

As to whether free speech is a basic human right, that's debatable. I consider expression something essential to human nature, but not all governments agree. So, as a matter of law we only have those rights that our governments are set up to protect.

Answer 4

Discrimination must be defined first till now you talk regardless of if against the regulation has been committed. some human beings evaluate a grimy look whilst being served with the aid of a clerk as discrimination. generally a denial of legal rights by using fact they do in comparison to you is an component of discrimination: refusing to serve you at a cafe, denying you an place of abode, a job, a place at school. A snide fact or grimy look isn't discrimination, in simple terms rudeness. There are words consisting of minority friendly, minority tolerant, minority attractiveness, minority ambivalence, as examples of tiers of discrimination. on the different hand there are person-friendly human rights assured with the aid of regulation in maximum international locations. An occasion: If an unlawful immigrant interior the U.S. is instructed he has no legal rights after starting to be the sufferer of an attack, or in simple terms being arrested. The regulation interior the U.S. states that all and sundry persons in spite of beginning or legal status fall below the equivalent protection of the regulation. to disclaim him this human superb suited is to interrupt the regulation that is seen against the regulation. The link under explores what the which ability of human rights are universally. i'm hoping this helped some. good luck with your venture

Answer 5

The trouble nowadays is we're governed by political correctness that has evolved into this laughable, bewildering beast. Say anything that's considered litigious and you get a slap on the wrist with the promised threat of legal action for any further misconduct.

Just proves people in governments and local authorities are promoted to their level of incompetence.

Answer 6

If censorship was for the good of all, then let it be. If however it was to keep truths away and defend one side against the other, then it is the biggest crime.

Answer 7

In the West rather alot of censorship is in place to defend the human rights of those you may unintentionally offend. What about their human rights?

Answer 8

Why does anyone care? I mean, if someone censors out certain comments or phrases, isn't it usually because people have complained about their contents already?

Answer 9

I think it is naive to think that we can ever live in a totally uncensored world, after all, no one wants paedophilia online (except paedophiles obviously) and then there's incitement to racist hatred etc etc.

I think we do live in a society where we can express freedom of speech, with only a few limitations.

Answer 10

Yes! we should be free to say whatever we wish. But! I would draw the line at speech that sets out to promote violence etc!