Good ole American media does Maurice Clarette Represents every young blackman in america?

Question

You gota love it.....How come Warrick Dunn doesnt get that much media coverage every time he builds a house for a familly

How come Kevin Garnett doesnt get that same coverage when he put 22 students through college

How about Charles Barkley near 3 million dollar donations to the victims of Katrina.

This country hasnt changed abit since the sixties its just gotten better at lying.

Your right Bennette B

But it aint up to me whether its a racial issue or not ..It up to the media who promotes this stuff

Remember Duke? when those white kids were Crucified by the Media people were upset....Granted Mo Clarette is an idiot
but its for sure a double standard

Answer 1

I understand you argument and I can understand your frustration when the media doesn't cover the good stories in sports. Warrick Dunn, Garnett, Mariano Rivera and others have all contributed to society outside of their athletic achievements.

However, I don't believe that race in the reason behind the media's coverage. It is that way everywhere, the "bad news" stories make the front page of the newspapers and the six o'clock news. Media will always report the negative and sensational stories, before announcing any good news, regardless of race.

I agree that the media should focus its attention on more of the "good news" stories instead of spending so much time with the bad.

Answer 2

Yep, no one ever reports the good things black athletes, only bad. Maurice Clarett is the exception not the rule. Most black athletes are good people who care about their communities, but the media only focuses on the Maurice Clarett's of the sports world.

Answer 3

The media prints what sells. Unfortunately Maurice Clarette's problems are more fascinating to America than human interest stories. Please don't make this a racial issue. It isn't.

Answer 4

they are issues that ought to in hardship-free words be got here across after huge parts of trials. and evidently, strict restriction should be in position. in spite of the undeniable fact that, because the idea of technological awareness is continually replacing using new discoveries, we favor to really have sympathy to the drug company besides. they don't seem miracle makers, they in hardship-free words attempt to make salary with the aid of promoting some thing that they "imagine" ought to help human beings. imagine the international with out antibiotics and different medicine, what number of human beings ought to might want to die? If we agree that technological awareness ought to get replaced, the drug company ought to no longer have an excuse of increasing medicine prices because of regulation fit.also if we seem at the different area that has used the socialist equipment it has slowed down and did not stay as a lot as its Utopian promise. No equipment is suitable yet open and loose marketplace is the great accessible.

Answer 5

You have made some good points.

Unfortunately, bad news gets viewers. People like to tune in to see some guy get into trouble- especially famous guys.
You are right to be annoyed & angry.

Too bad we can't see/view examples of these men going what's right and setting good examples for everyone.

Answer 6

Maurice is just whack. He would do the world a favor by driving off a big cliff.

Answer 7

Dirt sell the news. It's as simple as that.