Well, I kicked around the idea of teaching Biology- I'm a genetics major- but I think what made me decide not to become a teacher is the fact that the pay sucks and that you are only guaranteed work 9, maybe 10, months out of the year. What really did it for me, though, is that little Johnny numb-nuts can get a bad grade and, rather than it being his fault for not applying himself, in the eyes of the parents, and increasingly society as a whole, it is the teacher's fault for not making their little imbecile learn. God bless the folks that have the stomach for it, but I'm not keen on getting paid squat for a thankless job. If everyone is going to complain about the job I'm doing, never mind the fact that it is one of, if not the, most important jobs in society, I might as well be able to make a decent living off of it. That's why I don't want to teach.
Another reason was hit on in another answer, although in a stupid way. Most science majors want to work in the field, or in the lab before relegating themselves back to the classroom. Considering that most science majors get a higher degree than most education majors, I know many of us just want to spend some time applying what we learned in the two decades that we have been in school. You can make a name for yourself, and a fortune, in research. That can't be said of teaching. It's an awful predicament, but one that isn't likely to change, now or ever.
2006-08-10 09:46:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great question Kris. I happen to be a teacher that has a science degree (biology). However, I'm an elementary school teacher. I love science but fell in love with teaching the younger kids. I certainly could have gone to the private sector and earned a much higher salary so that's obviously, in my opinion, a huge reason scientists don't go into teaching. I'd rather be very happy and proud of what I do for a living and earn less than hate my job and earn more.
I believe more scientists would go into the classroom if working conditions were improved in public schools. I've known science and math teachers that have quit out of pure frustration over inadequate supplies, dilapidated classrooms, and unsupportive adminstrators. I'm sure the unruly kids didn't help matters either.
However, although you said "other than increasing teachers' salaries" as a solution, you can't ignore the obvious.
2006-08-10 12:02:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by maxma327 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Money and there isn't much 'appeal' in teaching science when you could do something more exciting with the knowledge and skills learned like join Nasa etc. You already stated that salaries are the obvious lure, but maybe if the whole idea of science teachers was jazzed up a little, potentially you could get more people interested, right now it sounds pretty boring so many are turned off to the idea.
2006-08-10 09:43:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by cbatb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I can say that I am majoring in Chemistry, plan on getting my PhD, and I would like to teach! However I can see why people would not. You can easily get a higher paying job with a PhD in a science field. Also personally, if I spend all of my time getting my PhD I do want to apply it in a lab/career before I begin teaching. Maybe most science majors just don't want to teach? I think you have to enjoy teaching to want to become a teacher and not much is going to change it.
2006-08-10 10:28:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by BeC 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's an expression in teaching circles (primarily at the post-secondary level) that goes something like, those who can't teach do research, and those who don't like research, teach.
If you're referring to teaching at the post-secondary level (especially as it concerns professors), conflicts might arise in regards to various institutions that might emphasize excellence in research over teaching (i.e., the publish or perish mentality); excellence in teaching over research; and very rarely, excellence in both.
In addition to these external pressures, there may be general differences in the personality traits (and academic skills) from the outset, of people who become scientists and those who become teachers/educators. If you are referring to the natural sciences, persons entering those fields might largely prefer working in isolation (i.e., are not people-oriented) and have had very early experiences (e.g., in high school) concerning the sciences. Educators/teachers on the other hand are more likely (and should ideally), be people-oriented and probably come from an early education background that was not science focused.
So I would suggest the phenomenon you are observing at your institution might be related either to your institution's process of selecting students, and/or the types of students that select your institution's programs.
2006-08-10 10:13:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by mindful1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Give teachers more of a salary might give the science student's an incentive to teach. Also, offer to pay off loans. But other than that, I don't know. It's quite sad, really.
2006-08-10 10:05:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure how. If I was ever to become a teacher it would definitely be in the sciences. I love science! I think it really depends on what the person likes and enjoys?
2006-08-10 09:42:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Heather 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I studied to grow to be an English instructor and not in any respect had to take chemistry. extremely you are able to take numerous required classes before you get into your important direction artwork. the criteria for graduating extreme college seniors and faculty students has replaced through the years. in accordance to the corporate international vs the college districts, we are allowing students to graduate without the great thing about good writing, reading and common sense skills. some graduates are leaving college and function no concept a thanks to jot down a paper, have not used grammar, vocabulary and different written skills properly, do not comprehend a thanks to artwork in communities and stumble on assistance on a thanks to make judgements and communicate about those judgements in open dialogue board, making use of striking language skills. As a instructor in midsection college, I extremely have interviewed ability instructors for our college and function been thoroughly upset because the basics have left those instructors thoroughly. you ought to stay on the point of your dean or consultant and basically be sure you're taking the classes you want to take and acquiring the credit you want to have with the intention to graduate. Guessing can harm you. What you are able to take should be spelled out thoroughly in words of needs.....and then you will be able to take electives. I not in any respect took chemistry outdoors of highschool, yet I I took such diverse history classes, sociology, psychology, that after I graduated and received my degree and took the state's try, I had adequate credit/hours to coach not purely English, yet history, Sociology, Speech and some different classes that i did not purposely 'study' ..... stay on the point of your consultant! make effective you're taking all the necessary classes you want and then electives. stay on your important field in case you are able to - and also settle on that 'extreme college' those days can recommend - midsection-extreme. My certification became granted in 7-12......This helped me through the years. I extremely have taught midsection college (Language Arts, reading, Speech, Social study) and extreme college English and history....
2016-10-15 11:55:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
give them incentives to carry their research and their projects should b more recognised
2006-08-10 09:46:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
ban guns in school would be a great start.
2006-08-10 09:40:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by digital genius 6
·
0⤊
1⤋