English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Kick **** in Afghanistan. Secure cockpit doors. The end.

Beyond that, if you include all of the safety products, regulations, studies, committees, regulations, war in Iraq, etc. I'm guessing that the cost in both dollars spent and negative impact to our economy has been over a trillion dollars.

And almost all of it is a government-sponsored dog-and-pony show to make us believe that they are actually doing something, when in truth all we are doing is chasing our tails - if terrorists really want to strike us, - they'll find a way and they'll strike something we haven't secured - overseas hotels catering to Americans, etc.

2006-08-10 09:29:32 · 8 answers · asked by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 in Politics & Government Government

8 answers

I completely agree. We should have focused on Afghanistan only. Even the Arab world was telling the Taliban "Hey, you brought this shi.t upon yourself."

Iraq was just a bonehead move from a boneheaded administration.

2006-08-10 09:38:29 · answer #1 · answered by l00kiehereu 4 · 0 2

I agree with your assessment of the governments putting a lot of money and apparent i.e. conspicuous effort into doing a lot of nothing.

The best response, I think, would have been to conduct an honest and thorough investigation into as many aspects of the events as possible, including the media itself. Media coverage of the events of September 11, 2001 differ even between countries. For example, France provides a much different perspective, very often, than does the United States.

The government, as you know, like the United Nations itself, is on the system. The System, controlled by Freemsons of various forms, functions according to the ideological model of the yin and the yang (keeping good and bad in equal amounts and in equal proportion). A system such as that cannot move forward. It is static, becuase the balance between good and bad is being maintained. Freemasonry is an organized system of theft. Deception is one of many forms of theft.

You have maybe heard the saying that the System does not help anyone; it helps itself (to whatever it can).

Here is a link that might provide you with a bit more knowledge about September 11, 2001 and related matters:

http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo.htm

Also: http://www.savethemales.ca/000768.html
'Freemasonry: Mankind's Death Wish'

You could click onto some of my previous questions re. the yin and yang ideological model and on the System.

2006-08-10 16:50:34 · answer #2 · answered by spanner 6 · 0 2

Gee, I was going to point out what you have said. While the incursion into Afganistan was necessary; the adventurism in Iraq was not. The person who wants to tell you, and I, that our presence in Iraq has somehow prevented attacks is misguided at best. Today the Brits stoped a direct attack against our interest and our people. If we had the enemy so tied up in Iraq, that would not have been hapening. He points out that we stop attacks on a monthly basis, again it proves that the Iraq adventure has done nothng to protect us. As a matter of fact it proved the opposit. Only good vigelance by the interpol, and our own Police has stopped furter attacks. Our adventure in Iraq has done nothing to stop the attacks.

Sorry abou the typos, I am in a rush here, and the spellchecker is not working on my end.

2006-08-10 17:13:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Well because of what was done we haven't had any major attacks on the US since 9-11. Terrorist plotters are being rounded up every month. If you want to wait untill they come and blow up something in your neighborhood, go ahead. Its people that bury their head in the sand that are the ones that are most surprised when someone comes by and kicks them in the *ss.

2006-08-10 16:34:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I agree, I would have taken the money we have wasted on the Iraq lie, and used it to find the terrorists here at home.

2006-08-10 16:34:56 · answer #5 · answered by The Prez. 4 · 0 2

I would suggest nuking Damascus, Riyadh, Mecca, Medina, Tehran, Baghdad, and Kabul. That would've been enough i believe.

2006-08-10 16:37:12 · answer #6 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 1 2

The best thing would be not to be an unwitting thrall of George Dubb....

2006-08-10 16:37:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

THE MONEY WOULD HAVE BETTER USED INVESTIGATING WHO REALLY WAS RESPONSIBLE....AND THAT TRAIL INCREASINGLY LEADS US TO THE UNCOMFORTABLE DOOR OF THIS WHITE HOUSE..ITS TIME WE HAVE A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION!!!!

2006-08-10 16:38:13 · answer #8 · answered by tough as hell 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers