2006-08-10 09:20:01 · 52 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Who cares about the title! It's Samuel L Jackson!!!!!
I'll go watch it just to see hime kick some snake a**!!
And you know what? When he comes out with the sequel "Mo Motha f**kin Snakes on Mo Motha *uc*kin' Planes" I'm gonna go see that too!!
Samuel L kicks a**!!!
"Yes they deserve to die and I hope they burn in hell!!!" - A Time to Kill
2006-08-10 09:27:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I was watching the MTV Movie Awards and Samuel L Jackson did talked about the movie, especially when he said "there's a motherf**king snakes in the plane". I suppose it's probably a silly title, which has to do with terrorism and someone would try to rid of the deadly snakes from harming the passengers and the crew. My sister's looking forward to see the movie and she told me that it would be a trippy flick.
2006-08-10 10:45:18 · answer #2 · answered by jaythewarthog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe but how about these...
Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever
Killer Klowns from Outer Space
Jesse James Meets Frankenstein's Daughter
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians
Blackula
To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything, Julie Newmar
Bedtime For Bonzo
Sorority House Massacre 2: Nightie Nightmare
Operation Dumbo Drop
Big Top Pee Wee
I Dismember Momma
Phffft!
SSSSSS
Leonard, Part 6
2006-08-10 09:29:56 · answer #3 · answered by EdmondDoc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if it is as dumb as the movie. But I can say that if you were going to have a dumb movie why bother leaving people to guess what the plot is going to be with a jazzy title , right? At least with the name Snakes on a plane you are for certain that your movie can never be as dumb as the people who go to see it.
2006-08-10 09:23:30 · answer #4 · answered by jennanna 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is what they call the ultimate high concept movie. The title tells you everything you need to know. You can imagine exactly what kind of movie this is going to be, and you already know whether you want to see it or not. So I have to disagree with you. I think it's a great title, though I doubt it's a movie that I'm going to run out to see.
2006-08-10 09:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by rollo_tomassi423 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Snakes on a Plane? People on a Plane? Yes, a very stupid movie title.
2006-08-10 09:23:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I love the name. It plays off of how stupid the movie will actually be. For that reason I love the title. Plus look how much attention the title alone has gotten it.
2006-08-10 09:48:10 · answer #7 · answered by Uncreative Name 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fun Fact: The producers were planning on changing the title during pre-production, but Samuel L. Jackson said he would only star in it if they kept that title. Bizarre right? But how many of you would say no to Mr. Jackson? Not I! Not because I would be afraid of him dropping out... I'm just scared of the man.
2006-08-10 09:56:07 · answer #8 · answered by timmybear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the simplicity of the title allows for it to be a great movie. Who needs a big confusing title, when this title states it all?
2006-08-10 09:30:44 · answer #9 · answered by sethjt1991 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey that's SAMUEL L. JACKSON. He's da shiznit. The dang movie could be called, "Poop on the Plane." It could be about a plane smelling like crap and Samuel Jackson will turn it into an Oscar nominated movie.
2006-08-10 10:15:39 · answer #10 · answered by Babyface 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Close but How 'bout "The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With The Sea"? Nine words!
The Marquee locally Had It "...With Grace from ..."etc.
Missed "Snakes.." Sounds like I lucked-out.
2006-08-10 10:06:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋