neither, US is not the world policeman
2006-08-14 09:16:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by niceman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither.
It would be UN intervention in the conflict between Israel/Lebanon and UN intervention in Darfur.
The US has no right to go anywhere in the world without international agreement.
Welcome to the community of states!
2006-08-10 09:47:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by rmartin1978 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are equally horrific tragedies and the world needs to take notice of both.
But Darfur is extra brutal as the rebels/gorillas attack women & children for no reason. They kill any men, rape & beat the girls & women and steal any and everything.
Does anyone really know why they are rebelling anymore???
I agree with TheForce51 there is no money or oil in it for the US...
2006-08-10 09:27:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Darfur of course. Israel can look after themselves. They have only just begun.
2006-08-10 09:26:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Black Beauty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well there is no profit or oil in Darfur.By the way, Coragryph hasn't got a clue about who the terrorists are cause he's been watching Fox and CNN like a good sheep.
2006-08-10 09:24:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by theforce51 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Darfur, more people are dying there, Israel has Hezbollah handled.
2006-08-10 09:25:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by pinkgoatwithmentalissues 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Darfur.
Israel can fight its own battles, as long as the rest of the world doesn't start coming down on the side of the terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas
2006-08-10 09:21:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Whatever we do, the media and all the silly libs will say it is wrong, so what does it matter? I think we should start nuking.
2006-08-10 09:27:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fortune Favors the Brave 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dafur. They didnt do anything to deserve being attacked.
2006-08-10 09:26:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by JBK 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im down with universal!
2006-08-10 09:42:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by itsallover 5
·
0⤊
0⤋