the rights of humans vs. the rights of the natural world?

Question

Look at how humans treat nature: sport hunting, medical/cosmetic testing on animals, deforestation, environmental pollutants from manufacturing, cars, etc

I believe in the sanctity of ALL life and that we don't have the right to just do as we please with nature. I also don't believe that we are somehow "superior" to all other life - your thoughts?

Answer 1

I agree. I think "speciesism" is completely wrong. And I think "Mother Nature", if you will, will ensure that our bad karma as a species will catch up with us...

People used to argue that we shouldn't eat tuna caught in nets that also captured and killed dolphins. People thought it was wrong to kill the dolphins. My response?

What about the tuna?!

Answer 2

maximum scientists immediately are afraid to confess they're non secular (even however nameless polls have shown that the ordinary public are) attributable to the particularly vocal atheists who use technological know-how to purpose to wreck faith. The Bible (Torah, Quran, regardless of) provides the concepts necessary to stay an outstanding, truthful existence. it rather is not meant to be an entire historic account or a medical diagnosis of the age of the earth. If technological know-how disagrees with our religions, it would help us with the aid of telling us that there is extra we'd desire to learn approximately our faith and why that's how that's. it could let us know extra approximately what the adult men who wrote the books have been thinking. at hour of darkness a protracted time, the Catholic Church did face up to medical progression by using fact it went against Catholic non secular dogma, maximum of which were put in place AFTER the Bible replaced into written. immediately, maximum Christians human beings understand and have faith technological know-how, inasmuch because it would not at as quickly as say their God would not exist (it would not, with the aid of the way). non secular concerns concern such issues as a thank you to be an outstanding guy or woman, what occurs on your soul once you die, and how and why you exist. those are questions technological know-how will not be able to answer. further, the fashionable Christian church would not attempt to answer questions that belong to technological know-how, such by using fact the age of the earth or what occurs once you place mentos in weight loss application coke. (i will not be able to precisely talk for the different 2 huge religions, as i don't know as a lot approximately them). it rather is rather not a query over regardless of if technological know-how or faith is optimal, that's a query of regardless of if atheists or theists are superb suited. At this factor, maximum scientists know that tackling non secular questions (eg, how a lot does the soul weigh) is a waste of time, and theists in many instances do not use their faith to answer questions with regard to the actual international (eg, how a lot does a tomato weigh).

Answer 3

I do think we need to be more in harmony with our environment, but that doesn't mean we have to go back to living in the stone age. Man has been making the world a better and safer place to live in by doing one thing better than any other creature, using tools. It's time we put those tools to better uses.

Answer 4

There are hidden contradictions in the minds of people who "love Nature" while deploring the "artificialities" with which "Man has spoiled 'Nature'". The obvious contradiction lies in their choice of words, which imply that Man and his artifacts are not part of "Nature" -- but beavers and their dams are. But the contradictions go deeper than this prima-facie absurdity. In declaring his love for a beaver dam (erected by beavers for beavers' purposes) and his hatred for dams erected by men (for the purposes of men) the "Naturist" reveals his hatred for his own race -- i.e., his own self-hatred.

Answer 5

don't worry....it will all eventually catch up with us....in the total history of the planet, mankind is nothing but the blink of an eye!

Answer 6

My thoughts are... I CONCUR with you!