English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Newt is calling citizens who disagree with the war on terror insurgents.

Roberto Gonzales wants to use confessions gained from tortured prisoners against them.

Bush is pushing for a new law to deny citizens labeled as insurgents/enemy combatants/terrorists the right to a trial by jury, and permit the secret arrest trial and execution of US Citizens and others who the administration considers an enemy.

Michael Savage has been calling for concentration camps for those who agree with Cindy Sheeham for years.

2006-08-10 08:30:13 · 4 answers · asked by sscam2001 3 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

WWWIII is over and you missed it. Try again you hater.

2006-08-10 08:36:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No. Who cares what Newt or any of those people (besides Bush) says, and even what George Bush says I suppose.

We can say whatever we wish because we are free nation. I don't think the USA is hellbent on starting WWIII... I think the USA is hellbent on not letting small extremist groups from bullying it and other free nations... even if that means they US has to step in and push those groups down... appearing to be a bigger bully maybe, but ultimately the goals are to reach freedom for people, not to oppress them, and I think it's important to remember those goals.

2006-08-10 15:53:42 · answer #2 · answered by Stephanie S 6 · 0 0

Seems like my connection to Yahoo Answers is fouled up beyond all recognition, so forgive the typos.

I have suspected for a long time that the vote fraud of 2000 and 2004 was a coup by the Radical Right. Since then we have had nothing but a flow of Radical Right Jingoistic Orwellian Psudo-Religious propaganda to build to a climax in a global war.

While I will tell you that WW III actually started on 9/11, I am still not certain what our own officials had to do with it. Unlike most of the theories, I do not think we orcastrated it, but I suspect that we at least ignore the threat. It played well into the Radical Right agenda of promoting the superiority of the Pax Americana.

I am still uncertain of the probability of a Civil war in the US to divert the blood lust that is pultzing through the national dialogue. But it is only being diverted because we do have enemies out there who wish to blame all their internal problmes on the US. That has been going on for a long time. Islam decalired war on the west in 1973.

Last weekend I put together a series of Bullet Points that indicate that we are heading to a global war. I am attaching the links so that you can look at them yourself.

There is no doubt in my mind that we are in serious trouble.

I also came across the following blurb in the Washington Post yesterday; I think it gives a strong indication of how absent we are of leadership in the US today.

Scripps Howard columnist Ann McFeatters writes: "To Bush, being
president means never having to say he's sorry. To tell him he might
be wrong or bring him bad news or cause dissonance in his serene
world is to antagonize him and be thought disloyal.

"It's now well acknowledged that Bush is happy in his bubble of self-
imposed isolation. He meets with foreigners but without true give-and-
take even in crisis conversations. Foreigners visit the White House
as they used to go on bended knee to ancient Rome. Bush travels but
sees few real people. All is scripted. He talks with advisers but
rarely interacts with members of Congress, even senior Republicans.

"He seems to care nothing about winning hearts and minds in other
countries. Foreign leaders say he lectures but does not listen. He
does not have the long telephone conversations late at night that
former President Clinton loved to keep him in touch with what others
were thinking. He seems indifferent to what experts think."

I could be wrong, but I think we have less then 3 years before the nation is fighting for its survival. I only wounder how future historians will record these times we are living in. Will they see us as heros, or are we the aggressors? I don't know. I think we are on the wrong side of the equation on this one.

2006-08-10 16:50:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Every single government in the world is corrupt! Why? Becuase it is human nature get over it he will be gone in 2 years (WWIII won't be though)

2006-08-10 15:43:22 · answer #4 · answered by pinko 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers