Bush-kissing SHIRAZ thinks so. Consider:
S H I R A Z
Why do you support Bush when?
he sent the Hurricans to new orleans to Kill blacks. he plotted to bring the towers down. he is secretly funding Hizbolla . he started a war to make oil profits. he invented the war on terror to keep the repukes in power. why ???????????????
He sent the hurricans to new orleans to Kill Blacks?
What?
I think its sad that a Republican party that is poised to lose the Senate this year has to stoop to this level of confusing issues.Really.
That's what you get in an election year,I suppose.
What I think he failed to mention was Bush's atrociously slow response to the hurricane.It prooves that our brave and ever intelligent leader has left this country unprepared for another attack.We cant even take care of ourselves at home,let alone spread civil war,I mean "democracy" abroad.
I love my country,and Bush has hurt it to the point I,like most Americans,want new and better leadership.
2006-08-10 07:52:17 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL. Nothing like some good ole fashioned ignorance to induce a good chuckle.
Didn't you know Jim, in order to love your country, you must love Bush! You're either with them or with the terrorists!
BTW, thanks for taking up for me. I appreciated that. I think I put the SOB in his place quite nicely, thank you.
2006-08-10 07:54:13 · answer #1 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush had nothing to do with any of it......he just doesn't have the brain to carry out anything of that magatude.
Yes I do agree with the fact that Bush can look like he is responsible for the actions of the world, but come on.....a Hurricane named Katrina. If Bush had anything to do with that he would have named it KKKatrina. As far as it goes with wanting to keep wars going, yes he is a war monger. But only for the reason that the US government is in cohoots with the big companies that make war equipment. Time is running out, Bush can not keep going as if nothing is wrong. Are you or are you not in an election year?
2006-08-10 08:03:33 · answer #2 · answered by John M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush did not reason any of the movements you propose. How do we blame him for Katrina? the subject right that's what he did in the time of those catastrophes. GB stood on a pile of junk in New Orleans and pronounced he could help those human beings come again on their ft, yet his application ended up giving $2,000 debit enjoying cards to sufferers - lots of that have been fraudulent claims. For 9/11, GB stood on the pile of junk and pronounced "people who knocked down those homes will hear from all human beings quickly!". How a lot actual federal funds and help got here to special apple to help the city sparkling up the mess? possibly a lot, i've got not heard!. will not be able to blame AIDS or maximum cancers on GB - yet can provide he made to help learn that replaced into in no way carried out - properly that's some thing else! limitless opportunities - yeah, they exist - yet u . s . a .'s electorate extra suited advance up till now they factor the almighty finger!
2016-10-01 22:03:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He... sent... the... hurricane. Right.
If he sent the hurricane, consider the whites and the Vietnamese in Pass Christian that were also killed.
Consider the thousands of white people and minorities also affected by Katrina.
Consider that if he was planning to wipe out black people, he could shove a million dollars towards the K.K.K.
Now consider Bush a black killer.
And how did he plot to bring the towers down, now?
And Hezbolla. I think it would be a bit strange for him to be funding Hezbolla when we're trying to get Americans out of there.
Where's your proof?
2006-08-13 05:45:06 · answer #4 · answered by Leafy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jim W back in da house!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No BS no name calling...facts facts facts.
You so right, the right will expose the left this election year by exposing FAR left inaccuracies, lies and myths. That is why I wonder why so many libs on these pages provide food for their fire.
New O was a clear example of how these two parties have let us down. I wonder if the Dem gov was afraid to call a Rep Pres for help? I wonder how much politicking was to blame. Fact is though the FEMA response PROVED that we are not ready for an attack.
This will be the year of the independent as I believe both parties are looking out for their own good as opposed to the good of the country.
2006-08-10 08:03:47 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is this the real Jim W? If so I may or may not owe you an apology. I don't know - Shiraz was immature to impersonate you - glad you got it resoved. Most of your answers I disagree with and alot of your answers are blunt. But I can agree to disagree. Just a question - did you actually respond back to my questions or was that Shiraz?
2006-08-10 09:49:14 · answer #6 · answered by therandman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush didn't sent a hurricane to kill the black people in New Orleans. He asked God to send it for him. Didn't you know Dubya has a personal line directly to the throne?
2006-08-10 08:02:55 · answer #7 · answered by Danzarth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man, you are F--- up on something. I would really go and seek some Professional help. To even think that somebody could control a Hurricane is beyond belief.
2006-08-10 08:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hurricanes are a random act of nature Jim. Great way to show your ignorance. Put the crack pipe down every now and then, it's really affecting your mental state.
2006-08-14 02:33:51 · answer #9 · answered by Vincent Valentine 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow. Um...how can Bush "send a Hurricane?" Dear heart...hurricanes are an Act of God. If man can manufactur a hurricane of that magnitude, then God help us all! But don't let your paranoia get the best of you my friend.
2006-08-10 07:58:59 · answer #10 · answered by sexy law chick 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋