English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Dont u see the little children crying with pain and fear in Libnan. Israil is risponsible for this.

2006-08-10 06:54:48 · 16 answers · asked by Muslim Girl 1 in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

No one is doing anything about it for the same reason Hitler got away with it for so long. Everyone is looking to everyone else to do something. When the nations leaders see that none of the other nations leaders are doing anything, they think it must be the right course of action. It's human nature, unfortunately.

2006-08-10 07:01:38 · answer #1 · answered by Emma 2 · 2 0

North America? South America? What do you mean by America?

Israil? Libnan? Where are these places? Do you mean Israel & Lebanon? If so, why should we stop anyone? It's not our fight and everyone hates the USA for getting involved. So I think it's time we just take our toys and stay home for awhile. You only want us when it suits your purpose and then when we come to help, you vilify us. Guess what? We're not interested any more. Blow each other all to Kingdom Come for all we care.

How do you like us now?

2006-08-10 07:01:01 · answer #2 · answered by kja63 7 · 0 1

costly Curious, i do no longer understand why the two, yet the two way they vote there are effects, and, i believe, the comparable is continuously interior the techniques human beings military commanders whilst they could decide whether to or to no longer attack somebody. as an occasion, there replaced right into a great stink approximately 10 years in the past whilst the Israelis positioned a bomb interior the cellular telephone of somebody who many times sent suicide bombers into Israel. It blew up whilst the guy replaced into speaking on the telephone killing him, and there have been not greater suicide bombings in Israel for here few months. some human beings referred to as this guy a terrorist, and a few referred to as him a martyr. basically undergo in techniques there is evil in this international, and each each and every now and then it takes a lesser evil to do away with the greater desirable evil. as an occasion, replaced into invading Germany by utilising the Allies in WW2 suitable or incorrect? you may believe it replaced into suitable.

2016-12-11 11:28:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Israel was attacked first, and all countries have the right to protect themselves. Why should the US stop it? Tomorrow you'll be asking why the US is there. Most of the world complains when we get involved then cries when we don't. The people of the US would just assume we help no one and instead focus on our own problems.

2006-08-10 07:02:55 · answer #4 · answered by jeff b 2 · 0 1

Not our fight nor our problem. You hate us when we try to help and say we're interfering. You hate us when we don't help and say we don't care. Either way we're hated so why should Americans fight and die for ppl who will always kill each other? I do feel sorry for the innocents but some of those same innocents were dancing and cheering in the streets after 9/11 so don't even try to play that card. If you feel so passionate, why don't you go and see what you can do to help them?

2006-08-10 07:04:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anna 2 · 0 1

And what about the little children in Israel that are being killed by the Hezbollah rockets that hit apartment buildings and the suicide bombers who get on Israeli buses and kill Israeli children?

Why doesn't the Lebanese government do something about the terrorists that run their country? You are a hypocrite and just see one side of the story.

2006-08-10 07:01:20 · answer #6 · answered by thunder2sys 7 · 0 1

First off its responsible and Israel. Second Israel is a state and not a him. Last but not least Israel has a right to defend themselves it's Hezbollah that places their weapons beside residential homes then Israel releases information to those residents telling them to get out that they are going to bomb those targets. You should really know about your current events before you chose sides.

2006-08-10 07:04:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yeah and while were at it send troops over to iran, syria, congo, lets just send some many troops to other coutries that we have no more troops to defend american land. Wake up.

2006-08-10 07:35:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well you are asking a question that would give these idiots a chance to show how stupid and uninformed they are all what they care about is your spelling but the kids are melted from Israeli bombs which are forbidden to be used internationally (wmd) you know who cares about the kids anymore its the spelling that counts lol.

2006-08-10 07:14:33 · answer #9 · answered by go_pali 2 · 0 0

Last I heard the world was ticked off that we didn't handle Iraq through the UN -- Isn't that what we're doing now? Can't please you folks.. Let the UN handle it Diplomatically-of course France is going to have to quit changing its mind all the time.

2006-08-10 07:13:13 · answer #10 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers