http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060810/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush
He claimed we were winning war on "terra" to make America safer, yet he just admitted the US is still at risk. In other words, we are NOT safer, huh, Cons?
2006-08-10 06:52:22 · 15 answers · asked by Kookoo Bananas 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He has to remind people from time to time that they need to be afraid or they will not obey and if that don`t work maybe another Peal Harbor event will work.
2006-08-10 07:03:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 46⤊ 26⤋
The level the extremists are willing to go has gotten higher because they have been succesful in some cases ie 9/11 The extremists have gotten braver and want to attack more. We are safer from the number of attacks going on right now. Before 9/11 there were not as many 'plots' because the extremists didnt believe they could do as much damage now they see what they themselves are capable of and want to continue to raise the bar
2006-08-10 07:00:05 · answer #2 · answered by da_man 2 · 9⤊ 4⤋
Safe vs safer
Does buckeling your seat belt make you safe when in your car? NO but it makes you safer
2006-08-10 07:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 13⤊ 4⤋
Which, of course would mean we are now safer than under clinton. Please think about your questions before embarrasing yourself.
Thanks to your buddies and the NYT we are LESS safe than we were they make great intelligence operatives for the terrorists.
2006-08-10 06:59:10 · answer #4 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 14⤊ 6⤋
You didn't comprehend what he said. He stated that we are safer than we were on 911 BUT that there are still terrorist that want to still attack us as evidenced by the arrests of terrorist in England. You do seem to have a hard time understanding reality. Lay off the liberal kool aid - it will kill you!
2006-08-10 06:58:50 · answer #5 · answered by therandman 5 · 12⤊ 8⤋
not all the way safe... there is always a risk...
but it could be worse we could be at level red and then it would be terribly worse...
but yes I watched it he said we aren't safe but not in those exact words.
2006-08-10 06:58:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 5⤋
what he said was, we're safer than we were, but we're not completly safe twist and spin all you want, but you can't hide from the truth
2006-08-10 07:15:33 · answer #7 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 13⤊ 5⤋
Read the whole thing, he never said anything like that.
2006-08-10 07:00:31 · answer #8 · answered by Matt 4 · 12⤊ 7⤋
I wouldn't be surprised! He also said that the US is safer since the 9/11...I'd have to disagree with that.
2006-08-10 06:58:33 · answer #9 · answered by Lindsey 2 · 9⤊ 13⤋
well he not doing a good job
2006-08-10 07:00:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 10⤋
I have no clue if he did or not... but that is the god's honest truth if I ever heard it.
2006-08-10 06:57:43 · answer #11 · answered by hyestyle@sbcglobal.net 1 · 8⤊ 14⤋