Well now i have to pay her 375.00 the thing is when she moved out i had took pictures of damages...
when i bought the house there was a door with frosted glass at the top of the staircase actually was a selling point. when she moved out she took the door that was in place before and after closing she took the hinges even the little whole where it catches with the handel Is it true that if u Mount something example a door onto a house it becomes property of landlord she didnt even put up a door there to replace iit she just left it empty so the heating bills were crazy.she had shelves she removed that were mounted on the walls when i bought the house she had cabinets she took with her..when i bought the house and looked upstairs all of these items had a partake in me buying the propertyshould i suit her for damages which is more then the security deposit the deposit was 375 ... i got a consrvtive estimate of 480$ i toldherlawer if she withdrew judgment i wldnt suit herr help?
2006-08-10 06:30:55 · 5 answers · asked by teenymacri123 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Renting & Real Estate
You have no claim to a tenants personal property. You would have a claim if the installation or removal caused any damage, but a couple of nail holes are not considered real damage.
Whose fault is it that you didn't replace the door or block off the area so your heating bill would not be crazy? Common sense should have told you to do that.
Your claim would be against the seller who should have represented in the contract that these items were NOT included in the sale.
If you did not make sure that the security deposit was transferred
at closing, that was your mistake.
2006-08-10 08:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by BoomChikkaBoom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm really having trouble understanding your question. It looks like the only difference is $105.00. Hardly worth a lot of time! And you already lost the suit for the $375.00 so the court is likely to see this as retribution on your part. Not a good position to be in!
2006-08-10 07:21:18 · answer #2 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because it become the owner's selection to back out on the perfect minute, she is entitled to no area of the deposit and ought to in reality be liable for much more effective than the quantity of the deposit. It relies upon on the state. Take her to small claims.
2016-11-29 20:31:23 · answer #3 · answered by escobeo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You bought this house and the person took all this stuff out of it before you moved in? and didn't replace them ?
2006-08-10 06:44:40 · answer #4 · answered by 'Cause I'm Blonde 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just eat your losses and be done with it. Really, this low amount of money IS NOT worth spending any more time with.
2006-08-10 06:37:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋