Saddem Hussien is now on trial for things we have done 500% worst.
gas his people, tortures, massacres, put people in jail without trial, and etc.
We don't even accusse him of those things anymore in public fear someone scream hypocrite at us
70% of american people believe
9/11 had nothing to with sadden hussien, Asama bin laden was Saddam hussien enemy, and Iraq had no nuclear weapons.
Shouldn't Saddam hussien be on trial for the nuclear we go to war for, for what we put him on trial for?
2006-08-10 06:05:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I do not fully know what Saddam did in his country but i think Iraq was much better, at least not hundreds of people were dying and injured everyday as what is happening today
Americans after 9/11 are believing everything Bush says, may be because they are scared of another possible attack and they want someone to comfort them and tell them that he will fight terrorism as strongly as he can even if he is lying
And if Saddam is to be tried for being a war criminal, then Bush, Sharon, Olmert, Clinton and many others should be tried also or we are judging with different yardsticks here?!
2006-08-10 06:30:01 · answer #1 · answered by Different 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"70% of american people believe
9/11 had nothing to with sadden hussien, Asama bin laden was Saddam hussien enemy, and Iraq had no nuclear weapons."
your question is ridiculous and untrue
the quote here is outstanding considering hussein did have nothing to do with 9/11 , where has that been stated that he did ?
2006-08-10 06:16:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shawn refering to your question on palestine. Its a fake. Are you refering to the terror allert? You can answer in that other question if you like. I think they may just want to scare us americans again. Where is the proof? I know the terror codes were brought the us public in fear and made them accepting of the fake wmd theory. It was a contitioning terror thing to scare us into accepting of war. All I saw was a nervous fat man who was really poorly dressed from the uk from some generian security answering questions really cautiously that had no answer in circles about nothing. Tony Blair is scaring us now. How cute. What happened anything? This is really stupid. They are just wrecking air travel and guess what? I am going to drive and if they cannot make me comfortable internationally I am going to skip flying for a while and do something else. Perhaps drive to a nice realaxing spa. Ahh the luxury of the international flight with a plastic bag. Unless the airlines give us all the comforts of home provided by them I am not going.
What the heck is with this terror allert and what the heck happened did anything? Or is the decider and blair boy just terrorizing their respecitve countries again?
2006-08-10 07:15:10 · answer #3 · answered by adobeprincess 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no longer prepared on Bush, yet that's for sale. If he replaced right into a dictator, he could nonetheless be on properly of issues. Dictators do no longer step down after non violent elections. certain, Saddam killed Kurds. certain, the Kurds have for hundreds of years needed their own usa, so that they certainly took a danger to create that usa at the same time as the Iraq replaced into in limbo. certain, he did gas them. I actually have under no circumstances heard anybody heavily question this, because it truly is an argument of actuality. maximum Iraqis were hardly ever loving in the route of Hussein. They accompanied him because in the adventure that they did not they could be shot. actually. Taken contained in the approach the evening and beaten, likely killed. contained in the elections he ran unopposed because it replaced into unlawful to mission the Baath get at the same time.
2016-11-23 19:29:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to put him on trial for having or using nuclear weapons, when there is no evidence whatsoever that he did either.
But Iraq can put him on trial for the atrocities he committed, for which there is overwhemlimg evidence.
2006-08-10 06:22:05 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are you questioning the Iraqi people? They are the ones prosecuting Saddam for his criminal actions and acts of genocide against them. What are you saying ?
2006-08-10 06:27:20 · answer #6 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
70% of the people in America also believe everything they hear. And the Iraqi government has him on trial, not the U.S.
2006-08-10 06:10:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
just shoot him
2006-08-10 06:13:55 · answer #8 · answered by HEY boo boo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋