I personally think he will. I want others to respond. Please be serious and answer only if you have a true opinion.
2006-08-10 06:03:00 · 36 answers · asked by Bubba B 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I love the cut and paste people.
2006-08-10 06:36:57 · update #1
bringing a country back to prosperity from the failure of clinton policies and the economic recession that he created, leading over the greatest tragedy since pearl harbor, commander in chief of 2 wars against oppression, in my opinion thats a pretty good presidencies.
2006-08-10 06:14:01 · answer #1 · answered by jasonalwaysready 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Can you please tell me under WHAT criteria you think this man deserves anything but jail time. He refused to listen when Clinton told him the BinLaudin was a threat, he KNEW the levies in New Orleans would break and yet he did nothing. Your CHILDREN will be paying for this war for their entire lives. The top 1% of the top 10% of the wealthiest families in this country are the ONLY ones that have benefited from his tax cuts. Ask ANY teacher how much of an F-up his "no child left behind" policy has been. Ask ANY college student trying to get a loan since he has gutted funding for college education how that's working for them. Ask anyone who is loosing their home because they had a medical emergency and they can't declare bankruptcy now how great Bush is. Or how about the working mother who has to choose now between gas for the car to get to work and food for her kids. I bet she thinks Bush is swell.
YOU need to get off the kool-aid!
2006-08-10 06:39:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
islamic muslims... is that kind of like Police law enforcement officials from the Simpsons? First, something is a hazard, yet i think of your question implies a sort of fallacy of historic previous that's being perpetuated by applying the subject in question (Prez Bush). there's no genuine end-game for historic previous the place consensus is reached and the subject (be it a president or a civilization) will become "established". President Bush is going down this highway while he argues that historians have not made up their minds approximately Lincoln yet (implying that they ever will). the finished element of historic previous is to critically verify the previous, from the archives available to the modern-day in an attempt to the two undertaking or toughen uncomplicated information. Now on your incontrovertible fact that we've been hated by applying (i'm achieved teasing relating to the designation you gave them) anti-American Islamists... they have been around for some years, fueled by applying Sayyid Qutb, Abdullah Azzam, and Osama Bin encumbered between many others. The question is, is the appliance of annoying skill (militia rigidity) inflicting greater earnings or injury to this circulate? i think of it extremely is an exceptionally puzzling and sophisticated calculation to make. remember, "terror" isn't a state on a map, it extremely is a sound technique of assymetric conflict. As considerable as militia victories are, propaganda victories are in basic terms as plenty so. we are the preeminent skill, so we continually have a captive objective audience. Our reaction surely has a skill on radicalization. additionally, we've made an intensive investment in one area, this has diminished our geopolitical flexibility someplace else. this could additionally be a element of of our calculation while pondering legacy. My element is that that isn't a black and white concern, it extremely is complicated and distinctly dynamic.
2016-11-04 07:14:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he has led our country down a path to where the world despises us and we have gotten ourselves into 2 wars (a 3rd if we go into Iran as some neocons want) that are going badly. A great president should inspire it's citizens to want to do great things and be productive members of the international community. Bush has done none of that and instead has alienated us from many allies. I am truly afraid of GW Bush and his world view!
2006-08-10 06:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe he should but thats not to say he will. Freeing a nation from an eveil dictatot is no small accomplishments and i believe Bush should go down in history as a noble and courageous leader for doing so. The war has unfortunately overshadowed some of Bush's other accomplishments as well in areas such as the economy, and education. And in 10-15 years when some of are greatest allies of the US are Afganistan, and Iraq i think the world will be thanking Bush, thats hoping the US stays the course and succeds in those countries. But even if they dont become are best allies i still think BUsh was a good president.
2006-08-10 06:08:54 · answer #5 · answered by stewcat123 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Are you high? You can't be serious. Most of America doesnt' even argree with him. Sure, I'm very happy we have Suddam. I still wouldn't even consider the thought if we had Osama. We were mislead into a WAR. I don't even think he is intelligent. Everyone HAS to tell him what to say. If he could catch Osama, approve stem cell research, truly try to save our enviroment, encourage businesses to use solar power, manufacture more cars that don't rely on gasoline, create peace in the Middle East (with UN's help) and make us be and feel like the greatest nation in the world again, I'd consider it.
2006-08-10 06:21:35 · answer #6 · answered by mary h 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, a president is rated on how wisely he makes the choices he was elected to make for a country. JFK was president during a very tense time of nuclear buildup between super powers and handled it gracefully by neither starting WW3 nor backing down, nor yielding to the country's eagerness to crush communism. In our time we've seen George Bush begin a war on an intangible human behavior (terrorism) that has bread to much hatred for the western world that yet more people have been pushed to that extreme of terrorism. Embarassingly he's nearly abandonned one war for the war he'd originally been eager to fight to somehow avenge his father by destroying Saddam Hussaine. He's spent billions on this aimless and foe-less endevour, while in his home country neglecting the crisis in
2006-08-10 06:18:29 · answer #7 · answered by pandora 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
LMAO! Sorry, you don't ask a serious question, I have to laugh. If the history book is penned by Fox News, or Bush himself, then perhaps. But, if you want serious discussion, you really should qualify your response with some examples of how he WOULD go down as the greatest president ever.
2006-08-10 06:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Although Bush has done many positive things for the environment, economy and was on duty during 9/11, he will probably not be remembered as a great president since he has not (yet) fundamentally changed anything in this world. Time will tell.
He will be remembered as the first president to seriously take on terrorism and for establishing democracy in the middle east.
Reagan took on communism and won.
Lincoln took on slavery and won.
Washington founded the country and fought against his birth country, England.
2006-08-10 06:07:16 · answer #9 · answered by Plasmapuppy 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Separate panels of historians in Europe and the USA have voted Bush the worst president in history. This is due to a combination of war, corruption and debt. The Texas Twit is the worst president in history.
2006-08-10 06:08:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well let's see, he took a world that was united behind America on 9/11 and promptly pissed it all away on some glory venture in Iraq. In order to be a great president, he actually has to do something great. Since he has not, and everything he touches (Iraq, Katrina, the deficit, Abu Graib, Not catching Osama, Lebanon) turns into a situation in which most of us are praying "please let it not turn into a complete FUBAR" I think he'll be competing with Hoover and Taft for Worst President Ever.
2006-08-10 06:11:18 · answer #11 · answered by derkaiser93 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋