English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Person was involved in an accident, their auto insurance had lapsed, the accident was not their fault, the person works for the county and supposedly the supervisor found out about the accident thru the police rpt or court papers. The person I know told me she was let go b/c of this and for having someone take care of a parking ticket she freceived. Sounds a little fishy to me

2006-08-10 05:52:30 · 7 answers · asked by Thomas Z 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

7 answers

Sounds like she broke the law by not having insurance.

2006-08-10 05:56:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont see how her not having insurance on her car is a reason to be fired, unless she was driving a county vehicle or driving her vehicle for work purposes. I worked for the county for a few years and had to show them my license and proof of insurance, as i drove from client to client with my own vehicle and they paid me mileage......sounds like they just canned her for no reason. got a case i would say

2006-08-10 06:19:24 · answer #2 · answered by Nygirlgonesouth 3 · 0 0

some companies write into the terms and conditions that you should have not have a criminal record and this is seen as breach of contract. It depends on the type of business and work involved how strictly this is enforced - e.g cannot have a lawyer with a criminal record

2006-08-10 05:59:38 · answer #3 · answered by honeypot 3 · 0 0

having a drivers lisence and ins is not required for a job unless it entails driving...but yepp it sounds fishy bet theres a lot more to the story

2006-08-10 06:00:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you are not a contracted employee you are a at will employee to rap that up if your not contracted they can fire you for almost any reason with a few exceptions

2006-08-10 08:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by law99391 1 · 0 0

whether you have motor vehicle coverage, it won't enlarge to a Uhaul truck because of fact very own motor vehicle coverage purely extends to non-public passenger autos. you need to purchase all of the coverage (criminal duty & collision) offered via Uhaul. We did even however we had automobile coverage. It wasn't high priced as quickly as we rented ours, i do no longer even undergo in innovations what it became so it did no longer stand out as an fee. Uhauls are large & in case you're no longer used to using a huge automobile, there is extra of of venture of something going incorrect from misjudging the room you have. in case you ever hit somebody with it & you probably did no longer have the coverage, you may owe for damages to their automobile, actual harm & automobile apartment (which would be many hundreds of greenbacks) out of your guy or woman pocket & this would actual ensue hundreds of miles remote from the place you probably did stay or would be residing, what a multitude. Plus, you may owe for damages to the Uhaul truck. are you able to cope with to pay for that?? it rather is plenty extra inexpensive to purchase the coverage, to your guy or woman peace of innovations, whether you by no ability ought to apply it. be beneficial you purchase sufficient mileage. they're going to ask to your holiday spot so be beneficial in case you need to head off the universal direction, you get some extra mileage. as quickly as we moved we had to try this because of fact we've been staying with acquaintances 25 miles out of how of the holiday & we instructed them that, they have been happy with it & replaced our holiday spot city slightly & it worked.

2016-12-14 03:51:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

where i am they don't have to give you a reason to be fired . this example shows irresponsibility on character though

2006-08-10 05:57:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers