I don't think if he had to fight his own war or even be on the sidelines by the troops... I don't think we would be at war
2006-08-10 05:40:47 · 14 answers · asked by Luis T 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeah whatever happened to alexander the great leading his troops to battle, i want to see GW sitting on top of a hummer next to my little brother...
i wish he and saddam just faught or f%*&d in the very beginning of this mess so they could just relieve their own personal issues without hurting anyone else in the process... this is why i now call this Bush's war, and I hope his legacy is forever tied to this travesty.
And what duty calls at home? he should spend his month long vacations over there, instead of choking on pretzels in crawford...
2006-08-10 05:48:14 · answer #1 · answered by Jonny Propaganda 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Chess is an ancient game of strategy, movement, and warfare, thought up long before America and long before Bush. Like the chess king , the President doesn't have the option and is not allowed to go into battle. The chess player is really the king, and he commands the deployment of his forces and suffers with them when some of them are lost in battle.
2006-08-10 12:59:32 · answer #2 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All the Bushes served time in the military.
Just because he's not in the trenches with a gun in his hand, doesn't mean he ain't fighting the war....
I'm guessing the chance of Presidential Asassination in the good ol' US of A is a problem equal or greater of a threat than being killed today in Iraq....
2006-08-10 12:46:10 · answer #3 · answered by Gurn B 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes
2006-08-10 12:47:19 · answer #4 · answered by mountaincutie1178 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Does the CEO of McDonalds make cheesburgers?
Does Bill Gates put software into computers?
Does Donald Trump dig hole posts?
LEADERS do not go in o the trenches. someone has to make the big decisions.
THAT is a stupid point and an ill-educated statement.
TFTP
2006-08-10 12:47:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Not a chance. In fact, if he had to send his own kids before he could send anybody else, we wouldn't be in Iraq.
2006-08-10 12:45:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
No, we'd be at peace because Chimp is a COWARD who likes to send other people's kids to die for his own benefit.
2006-08-10 12:46:06 · answer #7 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I disagree. I thinkt here is a possibility he would. He may even want to, but duty calls at home.
2006-08-10 12:47:24 · answer #8 · answered by redfernkitty 3 · 1⤊ 6⤋
i think we'd all be at Chuck E Cheese. great question.
2006-08-10 12:46:40 · answer #9 · answered by melissa 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
A big no on that one, chief.
2006-08-10 12:45:24 · answer #10 · answered by mutterhals 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋