English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-10 05:39:59 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

in *denial*

2006-08-10 05:47:20 · update #1

28 answers

They are simply not interested .They are only concerned with their "agenda"-it has nothing to do with loyalty to the United States or it's people. A large part of the democrat propaganda is based on "helping you folks". It couldn't be further from the truth . What they want to accomplish is to keep the needy right where they are . Once you are self sufficient , you don't need them . A successful constituent goes against a happy thought in a liberal day . .

2006-08-10 05:51:42 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0 2

Maybe because liberals either don't say this or islamo fascists don't threaten our freedoms. What are islamo fascists anyway? If they are fascists they have a leader right? The Muslim leaders that come to mind are BinLaden and Naserella. Do you seriously think there are enough followers of these guys or of some other lesser known mullahs to take over America -- this is what would be necessary for them to take our freedoms directly, since by definition fascists need a leader and these are the leaders that exist.

Of course, terrorists who strike against the US can take certain freedoms indirectly as when our government reacts in a repressive way by doing things such as putting people in jail without attorneys, without changing them of specific crimes, denying them access to a lawyer or the right to challenge their detention. I could go on, but this is not the answer you or most of your answers here are looking for.

2006-08-10 05:43:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Liberals are not in denial in America nor in Europe. They are fully aware of Islamic intolerance and terrorism. It's just that they are buying more time like pushing the problem a littlle further till it becomes impossible to breathe.
Then they would get up and put nukes or use a very large force on every such Muslim country which is associated with terrorism. At that point, you would have to do Dresden as in World War 2.
It would come to that point eventually. Just showing more patience; maybe tinking that the problem withers away with time.

Wars are not won when your hands are tied to protect the civilians. Because muslim terrorists and all extremists live the life of a normal civilian and operate from within the civilians.

So relax it is matter of time. When lot of people would shout, then the liberals would take necessary action. Republicans alreadt know there is a problem and they are pro-actively working on that.

2006-08-10 06:00:25 · answer #3 · answered by JIM 3 · 0 1

Liberals feel the opposite. They seem to feel that the innocent people living among these Islamic Fascists are unjustly being placed in the middle of a war.

The problem of course is that the Islamic Fascists are using the innocent women and children in these countries as lamp posts to hide behind.

They are pretty crude, vicious, and senseless barbarians for doing that.

In the end, it's a double edged sword, the Conservative approach or the Liberal approach.

Under the Conservative approach: fight the terrorism, at the expense of the innocent bystanders in proximity of the Arab nation.

or

Under Liberal approach, back off and prevent bloodshed and the expense of giving these Islamist fascists the time to regroup to form a counter attack on American soil a la 9/11.

It's quite complex.

2006-08-10 05:47:08 · answer #4 · answered by Tones 6 · 1 1

islamo fascists are helping with the removal of our freedoms and you're supporting it too. The patriot act among other things is us losing our freedoms for supposed security.

You piss and moan about liberals but you don't even know what a liberal is, I'd even go so far as to say that you don't even know that bread comes from wheat.

Bush is the terrorist, he's taking our freedom an you're sucking his d*ck while he's at it.

2006-08-10 05:49:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Well becasue the conservatives have already established that first and the liberals just cant agree with the conservatives even if it is whats truly better for the country. So they just play a childish game. They all have to grow up! If we were governed by liberals now we would not be on the offensive at all, we would be a sitting duck for terrorism of all kinds.

2006-08-10 05:50:34 · answer #6 · answered by stewcat123 1 · 1 1

I don't think anyone is denying that there are extremists that are seriously pissed off at western states. They murder out of pure hatred for what they perceive to be an oppressive global military occupation. The only way they see to fight back is small tactical attacks we call "terrorism". So aren't they really fighting for their own freedom... not threatening ours? Do we need to have the earth in a stranglehold to be free?

2006-08-10 05:48:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't think anyone, liberals or conservatives, doubt that terrorists are a threat to our country. It's how to deal with them that is the difference. Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism compared to Egypt or Saudi Arabia. 17 of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudi and 2 were Egyptian. So we attack Iraq ?...It makes no sense. GWB attacked Iraq for oil and to avenge his father's honor from the first gulf war. It's that simple.

2006-08-10 05:45:50 · answer #8 · answered by jim 6 · 1 0

We're not in denial,we know the truth unlike the
cons that have their heads up their asses blindly following a Nazi President into hell.Its a fact that Israelis have been terrorizing the middle east and America and blaming the Muslims because the Christians and Jews are afraid that the Muslim population of the planet is getting too big and might be the next great Religion.

2006-08-10 05:45:35 · answer #9 · answered by theforce51 3 · 0 3

What must be with regards to is the way they do it. Progressives proposes rules that they dont ought to abide via themselves, case in point, wellbeing reform, they exempt themselves from the comparable coverage that they mentioned grow to be so good for all individuals. Gun administration--maximum politicians have physique guards with weapons so as that they for my section dont go with them. Smoking prohibited in government homes different than obama can. Demean those with automobiles and SUV yet they rigidity in a limo. individuals ought to pay taxes yet rangle forgets to report2 million money nicely worth of assets on his tax return--no penalty imposed. Black panthers caught on video at vote casting area,--did no longer prosecute even with the fact that it grow to be a FEDERAL OFFENSE. and that they ask your self why i'm concern?

2016-12-11 06:23:37 · answer #10 · answered by erke 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers