George Galloway a British politician, spoke out in support of Lebanon, claiming that Hizbollah's actions in capturing two Israeli soldiers were justified because in his view, Israel had illegally occupied the south of Lebanon for 18 years, and "continues to do so today. He repeatedly referred to the thousands of Lebanese who are illegally imprisoned in "Israeli dungeons" as support for his claim that the capturing of the Israeli soldiers was not a terrorist attack, but an act of war against an illegal occupation.
Is Israeli blood more valuable than the blood of Lebanese or Palestinians????
2006-08-10 05:21:51 · 11 answers · asked by Captain W 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hmm, well damn, just by reading all this I can tell that none of you know what's happeneing over there and therefore you should shut the f*ck up because you're morons. I'm a Jew and I hate Israel and believe that Israel is wrong for what it's doing. I'm sure you'll all chock it up to me being a self hating jew or something but I attribute your answers coming soly from your a$$es
2006-08-10 05:44:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
If the Lebanese government believed that Israel was illegal occupying Lebanese soil, then it was up to Lebanon to seek first a peaceful solution to the issue.
The problem was, Israeli forces were on their side of the internationally recognized border until they were attacked by Hezbollah.
If the Lebanese government believed that Israel shouldn't have fought back against Hezbollah, then Lebanon should have followed the UN directives of 6 or 10 or 18 years ago and disarmed Hezbollah. They didn't. Instead, they allowed Hezbollah to attack Israeli villages and cities with rocket fire.
If the Lebanese government believed that Israel shouldn't have gone into southern Lebanon to stop Hezbollah, then they should have committed Lebanese forces to that region three weeks ago, when Israel asked them to. Lebanon again did nothing, leaving Israel with no choice but to pursue Hezbollah where the terrorists were hiding.
Lebanon has no excuse. It has permitted this situation to escalate for decades, and now has to deal with the consequences of allowing a terrorist group like Hezbollah to use Lebanese villages as military bases.
For an explanation of why Israel should not just unilaterally walk away from the conflict, read the real-life parable below.
2006-08-10 05:37:16 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's no surprise Mr Galloway thought Saddam was a great leader sadly that's what a kind of man he is. Hizbollah is a terrorist group and like many want Israel wiped off the map. Israel have been pushed to the limit and sadly it has come to this. The only peace-full solution to the problems in the middle east is when Israels neighbours accept its existence . Sadly Many on the left in Britain and America don't get this and seem happy to call terrorists freedom fighters and hang out with dodgy characters with anti - Semitic views. All blood is valuable and so is truth i just wish certain politicians and the so called liberal media could value the second.
2006-08-10 06:00:19 · answer #3 · answered by Katie B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You yourself said it was an "act of war", so that's exactly what they got.
Hezbollah is not the Lebanese government. If the Lebanese govt. acted, that would be different. This is a rogue faction with certain beliefs and hatred toward Israel that they were hoping to antagonize enough to get a reaction, and that's what happened. It would be like the KKK attacking Canada or Mexico for some ungodly reason...you wouldn't expect Canada or Mexico to react????
2006-08-10 05:32:04 · answer #4 · answered by pouchless 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i could say you're slightly biased in case you let a propaganda video alongside with this substitute your opinion - now to not prepare one and not using a backstory, decrease than 30 perspectives (that were likely received with this question) and with the help of someone named Ahmed Zoubi. there's a shocker for you. The founding father of Google who YouTube owns is Jewish, yet you've been nonetheless in a position to observe this video. There is going your "Jews administration the media" conspiracy theory. As for the video itself. those are infantrymen in revolt equipment, if you're actually not conscious. Now what's so spectacular in dispersing crowds? this happens on even a civilian foundation and in all international places over the international - Canada lined. As for injuries, do you imagine it truly is a twist of destiny the position replaced into packed with cameras? imagine it truly is a twist of destiny the ambulance merely occurs to be there acceptable on time? that's all planned and under no circumstances the first time. do not believe me? See elements. Palestinians are masters of pretend propaganda.
2016-11-23 19:25:33 · answer #5 · answered by lorain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Galloway is an idiot.You are way to biased to even address thanx for the two points
2006-08-10 05:36:57 · answer #6 · answered by david r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither side speaks the truth afterall the first casuality of war is always the truth.
2006-08-10 05:59:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally support ur opinion, but i swear u'll never prove anything to those who support Israel, they're very very stubborn and they're not open to any ideas. Of course wut we're doing is justified but they think that we're more like animals and they r the only people who deserve to live
2006-08-10 06:25:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, please drop the Soviet-style phraseology, ok? It reveals your true attitude and undercuts your pretense of being someone who's looking for the truth.
As for Galloway, he's a moron - 'nuf said!
2006-08-10 05:27:11 · answer #9 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you know when you start a question as biased as yours, that the drivel you follow on with is going to be crap.
have a nice day.
2006-08-10 05:27:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋