Well, if Bush is responsible for no terrorism now, then I guess Clinton is to be hailed for stopping that one, right.
By the way, you know the difference between KSM and OBL? WE CAUGHT KSM!!!!!!
2006-08-10 05:17:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Schmorgen 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Or what about Africa? Was Bush involved in the blowing up of that building over there? They have taken over the forn of Africa and now the atrocities are mounting.
Derfur is an example of what happens when Islamic Terriorists win the war.
25,000 children have been stolden the girls are being used as sex slaves and the boys are being trained to fight.
Cutting off arms and legs of anyone who dares to refuse what they want to do.
Calling themselves the LRA [Lord's Resistance Army]
Lead by self proclaimed leader Joseph Kony
Says he is a prophet and mystic of Allah
tens of thousands killed and 2 million displaced
This rebel group is better known for atrocities.
Now the president to get them to stop has decided to grant amnesty to these brutal rapists and murders. To get them to stop. Anything they want, anything. What do you want us to do?
Is that what you want the president of the USA to do to get peace?
Well, so far they decided that wasn't good enough. And continue the carniage. Giving in to a terrriorists demands doesn't make them stop.
2006-08-10 05:22:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOBODY ever said Bush invented terrorism. You cloud the issues by pretending to answer that which was never asked.
The policies of the administration of George Bush have fanned the flames of terrorism and increased it's strength and weakened the ability of Middle eastern governments to prevent their citizens from supporting terrorists.
2006-08-10 05:30:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you trying to say that Ramzi and Khalid are poor planners?
Who are you to say they are bad planners?
There are many planners. So many planners you will have to plan a plan to pan the planners.
No it is not Bush's fault,but look at his plan. His plan is not working either. Bush is a terrorist that makes bad plans. very bad plans.
Don't talk about ramzi again.
2006-08-10 05:25:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by mumin azraaq 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
thrilling element. yet do you remember the extensive style of airplanes being hijacked in the process the Nixon administration? those have been by applying human beings attempting to get to Cuba. They easily weren't Muslims.
2016-11-04 07:07:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by ravelo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, and violence has been going on for millions of years but republican try to blame music tv and video games. You're a F cking joke, you can't hold to an actual argument that makes sense so you come up with this drivil? Eat $hit loser.
2006-08-10 05:16:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it was,these people were on the CIA payroll long before Nazi George took power cause his daddy was makin sure the Illuminati would reap their profits by having his terrorist employees scare the crap out of the American people .
2006-08-10 05:18:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by theforce51 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anything bad in the World of yesterday and today is Bush's fault.
2006-08-10 05:49:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by captcookremembered 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously, it was his fault.
Instead of hanging out in the governor's mansion in Austin, he should have been running around Manila looking for Ramzi.
Everyone knows that.
2006-08-10 05:17:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Walter Ridgeley 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush Sr. maybe.
Look, we can sit here an point fingers. The simple fact is that we need someone who can solve this, not make it worse. I don't want to hear that another terrorist plot was thwarted, I want to hear that they are leaving us alone. K?
2006-08-10 05:17:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
0⤊
1⤋