Where are their pictures? Why do we continue to call these radical Muslim Arabs, "British nationals," instead of what they really are?
Why do we not call them Islamofascists instead of "of Asian origin?" Asian origin means Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc. These boys are from the Middle East and they were Arab Muslim TERRORISTS.
Let's call it what it is and show their ugly, Western-hating faces on television, shall we?
2006-08-10
04:25:12
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
yeah isn't it the truth. dont want to offend the death cult that is islam right.
I want to walk around town with a death to islam sign, but I was told by the police that would be hateful. Death to America is ok though.
2006-08-10 04:31:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The men they arrested are Pakistani origin which will basically mean Muslim as Pakistan is a Muslim country. I presume its an Al-Quaida thing. The murderers who blew up the London tube trains on 7/7 were mainly Pakistani origin (3 were Pakistani, one was Afro Caribbean). The Majority of Muslims in the UK are going to be Pakistani. So if they arrested Pakistanis then that means they arrested Muslims. Same old terror story.
I'm not sure why they call them "British Nationals" - it makes me sick to think these fanatical hate-filled would-be murderers would even dare to call themselves British. They don't deserve that title.
And obviously it wouldn't have just been British people they blew up on the those planes - if they were bound for the States then an awful lot of the passengers would have been Americans returning home from European holidays or business trips etc.
2006-08-10 04:49:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by michael2k_18 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I also noticed it. I think the reason is that there are so many Muslims in UK now, the government is afraid of antagonising them. So news is being manipulated.
Remember in Bosnia? They always referred to the warring sides as Serbians and Muslims or Milosevic and Muslims. Never as Christians and Muslims. It was the same later, in the Serbia /Kossovo conflict and in Sudan now.
What worries me most is that since they all use this style, it means that there is some agreement between government, TV and newspapers to manipulate public opinion. In the mean time Muslims are allowed to pour in by the thousand and immigration control is a joke.
2006-08-12 03:31:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
exciting element. yet do you undergo in strategies the extensive sort of airplanes being hijacked for the duration of the Nixon administration? those have been by utilising human beings attempting to get to Cuba. They truthfully weren't Muslims.
2016-09-29 03:12:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you want them to be muslims? You don't know that, nor do you know that they are "boys", unless you are working with them. Maybe the reason they haven't been identified as muslims, is because they aren't , or maybe because it doesn't matter, or maybe they don't even exist. We have gotten few if any details about this, except that we should be afraid.
You should stop believing what you are told to believe, and think for yourself.
watch this film and inform yourself: www.loosechange911.com
2006-08-10 06:18:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Me-as-a-Tree 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
well, facts are that it was probably our govt that planned and sanctioned 9/11....there is too much evidence to support this....and to protect themselves they keep the enemy as vague as possible so that they can manipulate the public...when they want a specific bill or law passed you can bet that they will drag somebody out for us to vilify and then when the govt has what it wants that person will fade into the background as some other story is brought to the front
2006-08-10 04:35:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by susuze2000 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
My question is why would you insist over the fact that they are Muslims!!!
I think calling them terrorists is enough because that's what they are. Aren't you openminded enough to understand that this is the cause of so many racist and intolerant shortcuts.
Why would you make things worst?
2006-08-10 04:39:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by fabee 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Liberals have made it politically uncorrect to call a spade a spade.
2006-08-10 04:37:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by composertype 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoLpDY.NW1lxOPXWXgIfCKfsy6IX?qid=20060811193218AAwEeBZ
In response to the question above...
I don't know where you were in the 80's, perhaps you weren't even born, but ripped jeans and colored tights were all the rage. Have a sit down and watch old reruns...pay attention to history...it just repeats itself anyway.
2006-08-11 16:28:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mafia Princess 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
pc libs. at work. we dont want the terrorists to feel bad about themselves. We need to help build their self esteem.
2006-08-10 04:34:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋