The Scientists say that initially there was nothing and suddenly something appeared from no where .Can any thi

Question

It is common sense that nothing can be made out of nothing.Things can come into being only out of something . Matter being indestructible , it can not also be created .it can only be changed from one to another ; but can never be destroyed .it may be visible or invisible tous too. are the scientists correct in quessing that initially ther was nothing and suddenly something appeard from nowher and the Big Bang was set off.?

Answer 1

i think u got it wrong. it is said that the universe began from a huge mass called the PLANNUM ATOM. when it crossed its critical mass limit, internal disturbances caused it to burst open and release all the contents which we call BIG BANG. so how can you say that universe arose from nowhere?

Answer 2

It may be common sense, but its wrong.

Quantum theory allows for particle-anti particle pairs to be created for short periods out of the vacuum state. The Casimir effect - which can be tested in a lab - shows that the vacuum state has non-zero energy. Be careful how far you rely on common sense - its not science.

And scientists do not say there was nothing. They say that there was a singularity. Because it is impossible to follow the laws of physics through a singularity, it is not meaningful to talk about anything other than the singularity and what happened after it. A singularity is like a locked door you cannot even look behind - there may be perfectly normal or perfectly bizarre things behind it, you simply cannot ever say.

Answer 3

Science is mostly going beyond common sense.
Science hasn't yet developed to the stage of answering convincingly how matter or radiation came about before the big bang.
Stefen Hawkins however in his book The Brief History of Time speculates that the zero energy before the big bang got seperated into positive and negetive energies and matter which is another form of energy evolved out of the positive energy. Sounds a bit speculative but there you are !
Incidentally, the creationists may also speculate who or how God was created - good luck.

Answer 4

Scientists can use physics to understand what happened just after the "bang" - down to billionths of a second after, but cannot yet understand the actual initial moment - the laws of physics break down at that point. Some scientists also don't like the thought of the universe coming from "nothing". Check out Brian Greene's "The Elegant Universe" to understand it better.

Answer 5

A RECIPE FOR CREATING LIFE

Today I am going to share a secret recipe with you. First, take a really large rock, heat it up, and make some oozing puddles of hot mud. Then just sit back and wait. In a few billion years, living creatures will emerge from the mud. They will evolve and eventually, some of the creatures will become men and women, others will become cows, and still others will become mosquitoes, frogs, birds, and even horses. Then, remarkably, some of the matter will become vegetables, flowers, trees, and yes...weeds!
Sounds pretty ridiculous, right? And yet , that is basically the so called scientific explanation of the creation of life that many supposedly intelligent people accept as truth. If you are in that number, I beg you to take a moment and really think about how irrational that concept is. Even if life self- started in the mud, where did the mud come from?. Where did the universe begin?. Scientist tell us that the universe is constantly expanding...into what? Where did the elements that make oxygen originate? Matter cannot create itself, everything has a beginning, including oozing mud.
In the Holy Bible, in the book of Genesis, verse one, we read the following:" In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth". Is this version of creation more unbelievable to you than the "mud theory"? Even if totally unconvinced, I personally would rather err on the side of caution. That way I would have a chance to accept God and his son Jesus, and be able to go to Heaven after I die and exist in eternal glory. My other option would be to accept the story about the mud....................?

Answer 6

It's no true that today phisycs says that at the begining there was nothing before the great bing-bang explosion. They have some ideas about a pre-existing field, Higg's field, who may contain in a different form the energy to make the big-bang works.

Answer 7

If you want to understand evolution you have to read these subjects and digest. This evolution theory is not complete yet. Scientists are keep on adding and clear some of the doubts we have on evolution. If you are a creationists trying to find some excuse for not believing the evolution then you are better of not reading anything at all. For simple minds there is bible. The evolution is for people who have evolved few more level higher than the creationist. Try to evolve then you will understand.

Answer 8

What you are talking about is theoretical physics. Theoretical physics doesn't always follow "common sense". Quantum physicists have been known to admit that even they do not understand why quantum physics works. Perhaps in time we will learn how this happened, or we might discover a new explanation, but for now, we just have to accept that we don't know all the answers.

Answer 9

Matter is not indestructible.
It can be transformed from and to energy.
The big bang theory doesn't claim that "at the beginning there was void", I think that someone else said that (Genesis something or another)

Answer 10

There is One Who can create something from nothing but to answer your question, no the scientists are not correct in guessing that initially there was nothing and suddenly something appeared from nowhere.

Look how orderly everything is fashioned. how everything has it's own time and place.

Someone carefully and carringly created this world.