Children face alot of inequlaites. They're weight may affect the friends they have, along with a bunch of other factors (race, intelligence maybe..). Its negative because these stereotypes are preventing all children from a relationship with an otherwise good person..
2006-08-10 03:49:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by MellyMel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The inequlaities that children face are the opinions and prejudices that we as a society put on them. The only way of combating it is by being aware of it as parents and to sent the best example for our children. This would also to help combat the experience of other children by having peers that have learned how to be positive. Hopefully our children can lead by example and the flood of postive and equalitiy will come into existence.
2006-08-10 04:01:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by snowfoxx71 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The largest example of inequalities that children face lies in the public school system. I can't tell you how many times I've seen an unequal distribution of education within the same county and/or state. It makes me so angry when I think about it.
2006-08-10 03:50:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by wrtrchk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thesis: Not every child is equally gifted.
Academically advanced children are overlooked by State funding in favor of mentally retarded kids who, with patience, may someday be taught to tie their shoes without help.
Retarded or low-achieving kids should be put in daycare, and time, effort and funding should be spent on children who are capable and intelligent.
My reasoning: someday we will have to put the care of the Nation in the hands of those who are now children. We should spare no expense in cultivating and preparing those who are most able.
Conclusion: Not everyone's a winner. Live with it.
2006-08-10 03:58:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by silvercomet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In terms of education, the biggest inequality is material deprivation. If a child is from a poor family, he/she is less likely to do well in education. Children usually go to whatever school is in their catchment are in Britain, so if they live in a poorer area it's likely that the school receives less financial support from parents than a school in a more affluent area will. The school, therefore, is less able to provide quality learning materials and equipment for its students, while their parents are also less able to provide help with education at home (such as access to the internet, revision materials etc.). Meanwhile the children from more affluent families attend better schools and receive more help with education at home so are more likely to be successful.
Tony Blair and former education secretary Ruth crazy Catholic Kelly's education reforms will only make inequality worse for school children. A significant amount of the funding for academies and trust schools comes from businesses and, more worryingly, religious groups. These expect to have a great deal of influence on what happens in the schools they fund, so we could see state schools going off in very different directions which means there'll be more inconsistency in the education system.
The reforms will also be increasing the number of faith schools in Britain. Not only do faith schools shove religious bigotry down children's throats, but even the state-sponsored faith schools are selective about which children they take. Because faith schools do produce good GCSE results, they are more popular with the lower middle-class who can't quite afford to pay to send their kids to private schools but don't want them going to any old state school. Publications have shown that faith schools are less likely to take on children from poorer families. The number of poorer children in many faith schools is disproportionately small compared to the number of poorer households with children in their catchment areas.
So what's the solution? Here is what I would do to make education in Britain equal for everybody:
1. Close all faith schools, grammar schools and private and public schools (public schools are not state schools) and reopen them as comprehensive state schools.
2. Surrender any money that the schools have to the state. In future, money should never be given directly to a particular school by anybody, but should be sent to a state department to be divided between all schools according to the size of their student populations.
3. Schools should take only the people in their catchment area. As all schools would have an equal amount of money (per pupil) the quality of education will be more consistent.
Another major factor in a child's equal chances in education is whether their parents are interested. If their parents aren't interested it's probably because they're not very well educated, so I propose to send them to parent school!
2006-08-10 04:41:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by quierounvaquero 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
everyone faces some sort of inequalities young or old, we just have learn cope.
2006-08-12 05:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a child in school becomes a teachers pet it affects the other students as well as the student thats the pet....................................
If a child is born in a race that believes that only male children are important than all children are affected............................................
In a gang where young guys are important roles but girls are side kicks it affects everyone...................................................................
The list goes on and on.........
2006-08-10 04:00:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by the answers are there 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
dont you remember being a kid well times that by ten
2006-08-10 03:48:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by envisiondreaming 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm... socio-economic, ethnic, physical, etc. Take your pick.
2006-08-10 03:48:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by ndtaya 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
abortion
2006-08-10 03:49:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by mason x 4
·
0⤊
0⤋