You are the laughing stock.
2006-08-10 02:36:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
This President is a disgrace. This is a guy who was driving his car drunk into fences at 40 years old. Bankrupted 3 different companies that were handed to him to manage. He didn't even read his own documents when he was governor, someone read his papers for him and gave a summary.
Bill Clinton on the other hand ran a tight ship. He was know to always be the smartest guy in the room at any meeting and held everyone accountable for getting good information in crisis situations. The Somalia operation was handle professionally and smoothly. He had tracked Bin laden and was attempting to destroy his base in Afghanistan with Tomahawk missiles when the Republicans went crazy claiming it was a cover up for his affair.
2006-08-10 03:09:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by dononvan_666 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
The people of the USA voted him into that position. At that time I'm pretty sure they did not know how eager he was to go to war ,especially with Iraq and "allies" as he percieved.. There were so many lies.
Now, those who voted him in should think very carefully ,look deep inside and ask,"Did I do the right thing?"
2006-08-10 03:12:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tigeripoh4301 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is the President of the United States of America. Although we don't have to -like- him, we should still respect him because of the position that he is in. Come on, guys, 2008 isn't -that- far away...
2006-08-10 03:35:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, Bush has toppled the regimes of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein. Al Qaeda hasn't attacked on our soil since 9/11.
Bill Clinton was chasing interns instead of terrorists. The only dangerous threat Bill Clinton ever captured was that Cuban boy, Elian Gonzalez.
Who is the embarrassment and who is the tough leader?
Many liberals appear not to take the wider, global battle against Islamic fanaticism seriously. They see Iraq purely as a symptom of a cynical and politicized right-wing response to Sept. 11, as opposed to a tragic misstep in a bigger conflict.
In fact, JIHAD has been waged against the West since Muhammad died only 1,400 years ago.
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan don't like the methods of Al Qaeda because they prefer the strategic long-term tactic of INVASION BY IMMIGRATION.
In 1968, liberals refused to acknowledge the Communist threat. Today, recent events point to the growing influence within the Left that is unmoved by the fight against global jihad.
ONLY WHEN THE LEFT AND THE LIBERAL MEDIA REALIZE THAT WESTERN COUNTRIES ARE AT RISK OF JIHAD WILL THE FIGHT FINALLY BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
2006-08-10 02:37:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
well the problem with Bush is that his knowledge of English is not that great, but apparantly he's extremely fluent in redneck and dimwhit!!!
BTW exhalted now I know what I was missing in my crossword puzzle
2006-08-10 02:41:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by peter gunn 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, he shouldn't but he is and the majority of us with over an IQ of 30 is having to deal with his mess.
2006-08-13 09:40:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by HiKo73 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush and Blair what a couple they make...
the answer too your q!
Just like should Tony Blair be on holiday right now... a ressounding no!
2006-08-10 02:47:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by AZRAEL è 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
You are asking a good question. I have the same distinct impression.
2006-08-10 02:38:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
i honestly dont think he does realize ,its the do stupid people know they are stupid scenario , even if he did realize he would care he has billions of dollars and daddy and daddys pals to look after him
2006-08-10 02:38:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by . 3
·
0⤊
1⤋