Absolutely - because I'd much rather terrorists blew up the hold than the bit I'm sitting in.
This is another nonsense designed to control every aspect of our lives and make us scared enough to value "the protection" of our government.
2006-08-10 00:44:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by nkellingley@btinternet.com 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some people who need carry on hand luggage for medical reasons, nursing mothers, babies need formula. The elderly needs different things to use to see, hear, etc. In these cases, there should be exceptions, but, for the average person, needing a hand luggage is not necessary if it means reducing the risk of carry on bombs.
2006-08-13 18:13:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by floridagirl2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can restrict hand luggage, but if someone is going to bomb a plane they will find a way. Restricting hand luggage would just add to another inconvience of flying.
2006-08-10 01:18:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
very few must have examine this questions and intensely few replied it besides the undeniable fact that i'm also between them a citizen of us of a in the previous an Indian as we gained't stay a citizen of two international places because being American resident we are no more effective Indian yet we are able to visit our mom land for ever and are loose to stay there too loosing all advantages if we stay longer i imagine , each body loves peace and hate an section the position there is not any safe practices . when I see terrorism is a international difficulty each body could play his or her position . at the same time as Malala a muslim woman can wrestle for preparation of girls folk ,at the same time as a baby needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and under no circumstances loose from its outcomes ,an afternoon could come at the same time as human beings could come ahead to wipe it from human minds besides the undeniable fact that it truly is merely too overdue already , there are any such large type of technique of destruction to wipe total humanity if necessary action isn't taken quicker . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all style of violent action pictures should be removed from media so as that we do no longer have get acceptable of entry to to them by ability of any ability . human beings can lease those style of action pictures for couple money and stand as a lot as wrestle with kinfolk contributors then to next neighbor then at artwork then someplace at paying for mall ,then anyplace he does no longer imagine acceptable attributable to way of media and elements he can get acceptable of entry to from cafes and massive call dollar who provide this freedom so really . Then we attempt to calm the recommendations that is already bombarded with a lot detrimental information international huge .
2016-11-23 19:02:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we should reduce hand luggage anyway. It annoys me that so many people take those large cases and bags on board.
My case is "cabin ready" but I think it's obtrusive, so don't take it.
What else do I need other than my walkman and a decent book or magazine?
2006-08-10 00:47:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by DTFC 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah! It's correct. I think that all intelligence should work together against terrorism!
2006-08-10 00:58:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by sheyla 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think we should stop people carrying all that duty-free gear onto planes ... especially booze. and we should stop all booze sales on board flighhts too in case the stewardesses are in on the plot.
2006-08-10 00:56:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by neilcam2001 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO ABSOLUTLY NOT. If we allow new laws/rules/restrictions in everytime we are attacked we are letting them win
2006-08-10 00:51:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by tweetypie88888 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-12 20:18:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by frank c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
what do you think. I am told they keep bombs inside their private parts, front-side and backside.
2006-08-12 23:26:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋