An Organization is Freedom fighter for one country and terrorist for other country. Who is going to decide wheter it is freedom fighter or terrorist? The UN has has lost its worth as it has no power to implement its resolution. Moreover the countries with vito power has made UN a maid. In 1948 UN passed a resolution to hold publicist (election) in Kashmir, but till today UN can’t get the implementation of its resolution and faith of Kashmiries is still undecided. The Pakistan and India had fought 3 wars on this dispute and still this dispute is the main bone of contention between two neighboring nuclear powers. If there is another war on this dispute and the 2 powers use their nuclear arsenals as last resolve, then what will be the future of Southeast Asia? And who will be responsible for this?
2006-08-10 00:15:42 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Unsuccessful freedom fighters = Terrorists
Successful Terrorists = Freedom fighters
2006-08-10 00:48:53 · answer #1 · answered by vison 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are the same thing from different points of view. The ultimate winner will write history, as usual.
If the USA and true western democracies (israel does not fall into this category) prevail, we will have defeated terrorism.
If the pan arabic fundamental islamicists win, they will have defeated the zionist and christian crusader infidels.
Israel cannot win unless they become a western democracy or eliminate their neighbors, but since they rely on the support of the western democracies, they cannot eliminate their neighbors (I refuse to believe that the USA will stand for wholesale genocide, even if it comes from israel). They're stuck in perpeptual violence because they refuse to become a real democracy with equal rights and religious tolerance for all under their control (palestine).
2006-08-10 00:24:16 · answer #2 · answered by 006 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kashmir is indeed a disputed territory.But killing innocent civilians and terming those killers as freedom fighters is a ghastly act that only islamist pakistan can claim.If they have the balls they should face India openly.UN no doubt is weak...but pakistan has lost it right to claim plebiscite as there is no democracy in pakistan itself.Not to forget the shimla accord signed by Zulfikar ali bhutto...kneeling with his nose to the ground infront of indira gandhi..what happend to that promise..bloody cheaters...low commitment people..Pakistan is a failed military islamist fundamental state which has failed to create instiuations of state like India has.Freedom fighters were like Gandhi,nonvoilence way of fighting..have civil disobediance waging backdoor war killing civilians on train and markets is not freedom fighting its act of cowardice taught by allah and popularised by Mohammed and mastered by Jinnah.....
2006-08-10 00:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by abhijit 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems that at the present time both nations have calm leaders that bear the responsibility of nuclear weapons responsibly
However no one knows what the future holds
This would seem like old business and should be address as soon as possible to resolve it .
2006-08-10 00:20:25 · answer #4 · answered by Proud Republican 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.lastdayswarning.clearwire.net/
I saw this site. It talks about nuclear war and says that it will come Sept. 12, 2006.
Whether you believe it or not the site is interesting.
You may believe or just have a laugh.
Take a look!
There seems to be a pattern from Hiroshima. Then there were Kamikazes (Japanese flew their planes into ships and other planes. Kill themselves to kill the enemy.) and now there are suicide bombers. What will the U.S. do?
2006-08-11 03:47:49 · answer #5 · answered by lastdayswarning 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mindless people only will protest this
please no vito
2006-08-10 00:23:04 · answer #6 · answered by thunder 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋