It seems to be increasingly acceptable, but I'm afraid I think it's just in poor taste. I was very pleased when he was arrested for it in LA. It's really disgusting behaviour and quite un-called-for.
I have no problem with his sexuality or even his promiscuity, it's just the way he publicly flaunts it. I read in an interview that he has a long term partner and they enjoy an open relationship so these 'encounters are purely for sex. Why on earth can't he meet guys in bars or clubs or on the internet or wherever?
Why can't straight blokes use public toilets without the fear that you may be assumed to be cruising for gay sex?
2006-08-10 00:14:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by le_coupe 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think its great that he is so open about it.
I like the guy, he appears to have a good sense of humour and a decent brain.
Personally sex in toilets doesn't appeal to me, cramped and dirty (I never had a desire to join the mile high club!).
Its the toilets that are usually disgusting, not the sex.
2006-08-10 01:21:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by zara c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he wants to have sex with other men then fine. It's up to him. But he shouldn't have done what he did in a public toilet. Not because I think gay sex is disgusting but it was a public toilet. I don't think you should have any sex is toilets, for pity's sake, go home and do it there.
2006-08-10 00:48:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not acceptable, but there shouldn't be any kids on Hampstead Heath at two in the morning anyway, and from what I've seen in newspapers, the only kids that go into public toilets are generally there either to queer-bash or vandalise the place.
2006-08-10 00:16:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
certain and no. at the same time as it nonetheless is going on, nameless random sex in public parks replaced into more effective known contained in the day the position there have been no or few venues for homosexual men to fulfill, and at the same time as a homosexual relationship replaced into very confusing to pull off. right now, once you could meet someone in a good bar, on line, at church, the laundramat, or everywhere else, and a relationship between 2 men isn't as socially no longer a probability because it once replaced into, the prospect of arrest, beatings, sickness or public humiliation is merely too large to participate in such acts. They nonetheless bypass on for some because they're stuck contained in the 1970's, or some men get a thrill out of the prospect of having stuck.
2016-11-23 19:02:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well - how many times you have had sex outdoor? I have done it. I think it's him being gay is bugging people more than him being caught in public place. It's disgusting but had it been disgusting if Collen Farrel caught naked in a toilet with a girl or it would have been hot?
2006-08-10 00:55:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by J M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disgusting.
1. It's gay. (no offence, but it's my view)
2. It's in toilets and parks.
2006-08-10 00:15:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Xan 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I find it all a bit disgusting and seedy,
He's had a boyfriend for years and they are supposedly getting married,
George wont change,i feel sorry for his boyfriend
It seems you can have all of the money in the world but this wont buy you morals and standards
2006-08-10 06:41:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I see other people's point about him going out for meaningless sex with strangers, but how is this really any different from straight people who go to clubs/ on holiday looking for one night stands?
As for children seeing, anyone who lets their child wander Hamstead Heath in the middle of the night is doing something wrong...
2006-08-10 00:18:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jooles 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hetrosexual and gay people of both sexes go out looking for sex with random partners every weekend at pubs ,clubs , all over the place and have sex in cars in alleyways in the woods ,whats the big difference with george michael
2006-08-10 00:15:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by . 3
·
0⤊
1⤋