Get your fellow to do it, it'll be a lot cheaper, and you'll both enjoy it.
2006-08-09 23:33:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by loopysu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Historically, all content management technologies covering anti-virus, url filtering and intrusion detection/prevention have relied on static defences based on database look-ups or signatures recognition. This type of defence has proven to be ineffective against new, unknown or unrecognised threats and attacks. One only has to think back to Code Red, Nimda, Sassa etc. to realise this fact. It does not matter how quickly the vendors can come out with a fix, it only takes1 hour for a new virus to circle the globe many times.
There is now a new defence mechanism which is pro-active and defends against first-strike threats - PureSight is one of the first of its’ generation. These technologies use heuristics and behavioural analysis to identify what a piece of code may attempt or web page may contain. For instance, if code is attempting to open a port, read/write to a hard disk, change registry settings etc. then one can assume it is malicious and should be stopped. If a page has a high proportion of graphic images, lots of animation, data capture fields, pop-up’s etc. it is unlikely to be a business site.
The issue with these types of technologies, which have been around for a number of years, has always been the perception that they do not scale. These issues have been overcome –PureSight scans, analyses and classifies any given web page in between 4 nanoseconds & 1 millisecond. They are now serious competition to traditional methods.
Perceived wisdom in the market is that behavioural-based analysis will eventually replace database-driven solutions because:
1.For viruses they can stop first strike attacks
2.For web sites can classify any site in any language without prior knowledge
3.Can be purchased outright rather than subscription based, so your customers are not buying the product again every year
4.Are as accurate as database or signature based solutions.
PureSight content filtering was recently ranked #1 in the content filtering industry by SC Magazine, a leading trade publication
2006-08-09 23:38:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by AdviseLine 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would suggest the hair removal cream that you can buy (Nair is one of them) you just put it on, wait a while, then wash it off and all the hair goes with it. I really wouldnt reccommend shaving, unless you want to be in a state of discomfort until it grows back. Good luck baldy xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2006-08-09 23:33:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kelly D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shaving is fine, until a couple of days have passed. Then you'll be itchy and spotty! Try "veet in-shower hair removal cream". The one with aloe vera.
Then, as you get further down, and in (!!!) shave using "Prince shaving cream" from Lush. It will leave you silky smooth!
2006-08-10 03:57:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by lickleangelvix 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on you... I find that whether I shave wax or use cream, I end up with bumps and ingrown hairs :-( but some women get on fine. Try them all and see
2006-08-09 23:33:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by miss_ruby_topaz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't shave! You'll itch forever - most unattractive. Use a hair removing cream.
2006-08-09 23:32:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Away With The Fairies 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends where the hair is.go to a beautians and ask.nair hair removal cream is very good i think and wont cost a fortune
2006-08-09 23:33:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lazer
2006-08-09 23:30:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Flower Girl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think cream- some say waxing but couldnt do that to much of a prude,unless i could do it myselfe oh no ouch.....
dont shave it will be itchy and spotty not a pretty sight.
2006-08-09 23:32:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i like using a cream. but i have waxed: ouch!; and used an epilator: you get used to the pain after a while.
2006-08-13 05:48:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋