English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Every American politician who wants to be elected wants the best for his constituency ie.America.That is ruining the US name internationally to appease the electorate ie.oil as an example.See USA intervention to make money to enrich..http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.htl.Why all the fighting with othrers.Civil wars must be fought in countries without interference...like the civil war in the USA...Iraq has to do that...But why is the USA interefering in other countries.Allowing Nigerian corrupted government to stay so that oil can come to the USA.This is neo-cons work? They are Christians? This is what Jesus wanted George Bush to do? Dont understand this.And the citizens allowing Egypt,Saudi and Jordon supported by USA to be undemocractic and advancing democracy to China, Russia,N Korea,Iran,Syria etc etc and work with Nigeria for oil and hate Venezuela who helps the poor on the mountains ( as if you didnt know-Doctors helping people internationally).Why WAR,WAR?

2006-08-09 22:09:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

This is a good question. Besides, if the USA was a peace loving country, it could have bought oil from Russia & Venezuela for special prizes, and then there wouldn't have been the problem of drivers in the US finding it heard to pay for petrol etc.

2006-08-09 22:20:09 · answer #1 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 0

This is all about balancing the powers of the world. That is the main reason we went to Vietnam,Afghanistan, Korea, Serbia, and Iraq. We help weaker countries in areas so that one country doesn't influence the region. If Iran was weaker than Iraq, we would have supported Iran. It not personal, it's politics. Every adm of the US has done this. Bin Laden was supported by the US to stop Soviet influence plain and simple. Today is different which is why we support Israel. If we allowed Iran and Syria to totally control the ifluence in the Middle East, then we would be having an even bigger problem now.

2006-08-09 22:28:47 · answer #2 · answered by haterade 3 · 1 0

So the rich can get richer, an the cost is picked up by the taxpayers."Wars are always started by those who have every thing to gain, and nothing to lose." " They're always fought by those who have nothing to gain, and everything to lose."

2006-08-09 22:42:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have no problem with it,If you have to get what You want and need by fighting a War.

2006-08-09 22:14:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in case you want to end US involvement, purely end it. purely supply up being in contact. that is that basic. the problem we've is that no one needs to end the involvement till the area is strictly as we like it to be, which that is under no circumstances going to be.

2016-11-29 19:55:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We have to do what we have to do cant wait for any other nation to help can we?

2006-08-09 22:14:45 · answer #6 · answered by freded_124 3 · 0 0

good points!!!

2006-08-09 22:23:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers