RSS feed -க்கும் Atom feed -க்கும் உள்ள வித்தியாசம் என்ன?

Question

தெரிந்தவர்கள் எனக்கு இமெயிலவும்.
[e-mail]

Answer 1

The question (translated for others who want to answer) is:

What is the difference between an RSS feed and an Atom Feed?

Atom is basically an XML standard for web feeds...

I'm not anywhere near an expert on this, but the cut & paste below is from Wikipedia:

The main starting point and motivation for the development of Atom was the perceived deficiencies in the world of RSS.[2] Among other things, there are multiple incompatible widely-adopted versions. The intention was to ease the difficulty of developing applications with web syndication feeds. A brief description of the main issues of RSS 2.0 addressed by Atom 1.0 follows [3], [4]:

* RSS 2.0 may contain either plain text or escaped HTML as a payload, with no way to indicate which of the two is provided. Atom in contrast uses an explicitly labeled (i.e. typed) payload container.
* RSS 2.0 has a "description" element which can contain either a full entry or just a description. Atom has separate “summary” and “content” elements. Atom thus allows the inclusion of non-textual content that can be described by the summary.
* Atom standardizes autodiscovery in contrast to the many non-standard variants used with RSS 2.0.
* Atom is within an XML namespace whereas RSS 2.0 is not.
* Atom specifies use of the XML's built-in xml:base for relative URIs. RSS 2.0 does not have a means of differentiating between relative and non-relative URIs.
* Atom uses XML's built-in xml:lang attribute as opposed to RSS 2.0's use of its own "language" element.
* In Atom, it is mandatory that each entry has a globally unique ID, which is important for reliable updating of entries.
* Atom 1.0 allows standalone Atom Entry documents whereas with RSS 2.0 only full feed documents are supported.
* Atom specifies that dates be in the format described in RFC 3339 (which is a subset of ISO 8601). The date format in RSS 2.0 was underspecified and has led to many different formats being used.
* Atom 1.0 has IANA-registered MIME-type. RSS 2.0 feeds are often sent as application/rss+xml, although it is not a registered MIME-type.
* Atom 1.0 includes an XML schema. RSS 2.0 does not.
* Atom is an open and evolvable standard that has undergone the IETF standardization process. RSS 2.0 is not standardized by any standards body. Furthermore according to its copyright it may not be modified.

கேழ்வியை ஏன் தமிழில் கேட்டீர்கள்?

Answer 2

i imagine for you to keep it, in spite of everything that's not nice to provide away a present from a chum. the following is what i could do, i could feed it some Babby Pablum for more effective or less 2 months, interior this time body it truly is going to have reached adulthood and be in a position to reproduce, then you definately can promote a large type of the little ones for income, you recognize like they do with the ceiling cats babbies. Oh, merely you should absolutely keep a number of the youngens to toss right into a salad. It really will be worth your efforts once you get to devour a number of those tasty little men. :)

Answer 3

Your Kelvi is not clear. What do you mean by RSS feed and Atom feed. you can e-mail me in sa8298 at yahoo . com. Enda Ooorba, chattuku vaariya. By any chance r u working with Airport Authorities of India

Answer 4

Ajnndh iruyhs rwfdnh sadk ddjwh dzbbnfhs k;rhjw dsaekd alkdw ,fwkfj; s;fhfw. sprouelwr foifhe lasedh sdj'wejfs'wr dw'rpion 2'4j fcds;lk 3;5lj34 54'6;j456 ';5m'k4lj6olkdgnm 4;'6lnjh/ '46knj'4 4'lk we;lrk3nyw 'w;lhmj';rtlhm.................

Answer 5

hi guy pls write in Eng.