yeah....permanently!!!!!
2006-08-09 21:28:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
he's the actual "terrorist" and he know too properly that there not something to be afriad approximately Muslims or planes, or bombs, they forge this conflict !!!!! they're the Illuminatis, and that they very own you, that's the hot international Order, and it is your destiny if the international do not awaken : And that's what Bush’s minions had to assert in 2000;- "added, the mindset of transformation, regardless of if it brings modern-day replace, is probable to be a protracted one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing experience – like a clean Pearl Harbor" venture for the hot American Century (2000) “certainly the hardship-unfastened human beings do not want conflict; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in u . s . a ., nor in Germany. that's understood. yet regardless of each and every thing, it rather is the leaders of the country who be sure coverage, and that's continuously an hardship-free remember to pull the human beings alongside, regardless of if that's a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the human beings can continuously be delivered to the bidding of the leaders. that's easy. All you need to do is to tell them they're being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for loss of patriotism and exposing the country to probability. it rather works an identical in any united states.” Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials "we are on the verge of a international transformation. All we want is the superb suited considerable disaster and the international locations will settle for the hot international Order." David Rockefeller: fact to the Untied international locations employer Council in September 1994 "For extra desirable than a century, ideological extremists at the two end of the political spectrum have seized upon properly-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller kinfolk for the inordinate impact they declare we wield over American political and financial institutions. some even have faith we are component of a secret cabal working against the superb interests of the USA, characterizing my kinfolk and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with different around the international to construct a extra integrated worldwide political and financial shape - one international, in case you will. If that's the charge, I stand to blame, and that i'm pleased with it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
2016-10-01 21:31:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by stein 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doesn't matter much as he is hardly taking any decisions himself.
He is "Mr. Yes" for the honorable President, and can say so even when on vacations.
If you really want some decisions in favour of UK and the Britishers, don't spoil his holidays, look for a better replacement in the mean time.
2006-08-09 21:37:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Saadi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Churchill and FDR took time off even during the war, so I'm not going to begrudge Blair his holiday.
2006-08-09 21:29:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
We have a government, not some megalomaniac responsible for everything. He needs a break to carry on with the difficult job which, in the main he does well.
Do the people who have attempted answers here have any knowledge? What's their source of information? The Daily Mail?
2006-08-09 22:11:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by lykovetos 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets see Blair on Holiday, Prescott in charge? Lovely damned if he is damned if he isnt!
2006-08-09 21:29:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paul B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No he gets into things then goes off on holiday every time
2006-08-09 21:29:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by yorkshireman_andy_newton 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hes a lame duck PM now anyway so it doesn't matter, he has little influence at home or abroad at the moment so he doesn't make much difference
2006-08-13 03:06:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. My President's on a holiday, too. Another one.
Even in the U.K., you probably know who I'm talking about.
2006-08-09 21:28:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by amg503 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he does not know about what is happening he should not be on holiday.
2006-08-09 22:02:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by patrick w 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He and Bush should be on permanent holidays.
2006-08-09 21:54:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by majorcavalry 4
·
0⤊
0⤋