that way buttpirates,liberal's,illegal alien's and terrorist can all get along away from us normal/sane people.furthermore when the terrorist start invoking thier will on the people we won't have to be responsible for saving them.
2006-08-09 20:57:03 · 9 answers · asked by onecoolrigger 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You do know that about 30% of San Francisco residents vote Republican, don't you? Although it is a somewhat liberal city, it is filled with well educated, open minded, caring people. You seem to be just as hateful as any terrorist, so I'm not sure you qualify as sane.
2006-08-11 17:18:55 · answer #1 · answered by Ophelia193 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
San Francisco is the most sexually liberated city in the Americas.
Liberal?
They make Nukes across the bay at livermoor.
When you want a really great time come to the city by the bay.
Most liberal--try NYC or maybe Berkeley, ca.. Sfo is just very sensual. Eat your heart out red states, but when you want a really great time... How about the world's largest outdoor bdsm meet in sfo? Last Sunday of September. Carpe Diem! I read frustration in some other responses. Perhaps a good orgasm will make your world right.
2006-08-10 04:17:56 · answer #2 · answered by Bob 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The liberals have already taken it. San Fran's problem now is ultra far left liberals, taking majority control. If they move left much more, they'll drown themselves.
They're also trying to prohibit Military personnel from recruiting in public schools.
Not sure where their priorities or morals have gone?
To say they have "tunnel vision", would be a tremendous insult to tunnels...
2006-08-10 05:49:42 · answer #3 · answered by askthetoughquestions 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't agree with their lifestyle, but that is their choice. The problem that I have is that many of their leaders think that terrorism should be a local law enforcement issue. I have heard claims that they would like to disband our national military. I read about this when they refused to have a memorial center for one of our decommissioned warship. I hope they never have a problem where the military has to be involved there.
2006-08-10 04:10:53 · answer #4 · answered by haterade 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The liberals already control San Francisco. They're totally insane there if you ask me -- their mayor thought he could unilaterally legalize gay marriage before the courts put a stop to it. Fortunately we control most of the country. Check out this map: http://www.oakparkgop.org/imgs/e2000map.jpg
2006-08-10 04:01:44 · answer #5 · answered by Kev 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
letting a city go completely to one side is a bad idea. It will only embolden and empower them to take more. If we give in we are admitting failure.
We cant do that.
2006-08-10 04:00:52 · answer #6 · answered by Jon H 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sounds good to me if we can push it off the coast and make it a island country of its own
2006-08-10 04:04:01 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
why not? san fran is a cesspool anyway.
2006-08-10 04:00:32 · answer #8 · answered by punchface 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah give it away it would be awesome....what a dull question
2006-08-10 03:59:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋