Both of them have killed innocents!!!!
2006-08-09 20:18:33 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Osama and Bush are buddies. Osama didn't kill anyone. He may have spouted hateful speech, but as far as I know he is penniless living in a cave somewhere. Well, except for the occasional care packages he get from Bushie. Bush is aiding terrorists as we speak by giving BILLIONS in military aid to Zionist controlled Israel just because he is scared of AIPAC. Not to mention the poor victims in Iraq and our innocent soldiers that died for his greed.
2006-08-09 20:26:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
definitely osama bin laden .he is a big terrorist he killed many Innocent people in the name of jihad.and spreading evils in society .but what bush is doing to stop terrorism. bush is just eliminating terrorist of world and this is not wrong thing.and bush have not killed the Innocent people he just killed the root cause of evil that is terrorists made by osama.
2006-08-09 22:29:41 · answer #2 · answered by timna 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
George Bush but what a lot of people don't know is that the bin laden family loaned the bush family money to start there oil business
2006-08-09 20:33:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
George Bush
2006-08-09 20:24:14 · answer #4 · answered by Rawad K 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That is a ridiculous comparison. Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist. This has already been established and is not debatable. If you don't like our current president then remember to vote. If you are not from our country then please do not visit. George announces his intention before he attacks someone, Osama sneaks up like a thief in the night.
2006-08-09 20:39:15 · answer #5 · answered by frogspeaceflower 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
George Bush
2006-08-09 20:24:36 · answer #6 · answered by The Saint 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think they have the same levels of terrorist characteristics.
Bush just has a few more legal hoops like a U.S. constitution, he would have to jump through to reach the level of atrocities we have seem on Bin Ladens side. We have a better system of stopping our own terrorist's and dictator's from acting out.
Bush is certainly trying to act out his hearts desires by placing equally dark cronies in every spot of the gov that can to help him evade our own laws etc. Strip away our laws, and his US opponent's holding him back, and Bush's heart would be obvious to every last one of us.
I think Bushs intentions are quite obvious to those that know their history and sociology and are not just looking through partison glasses.
2006-08-09 20:47:55 · answer #7 · answered by passenger204 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A terrorist is not just someone who has killed innocents, a terrorist is a person unaffiliated from any state or government, who uses unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence, often for ideological or political reasons
Say what you want about Bush but he is not a terrorist.
2006-08-09 20:27:36 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd say both. It used to be only Osama. Now since BUSH invaded Iraq, terrorist rose at an all time high. I don't see us safer now than before.
2006-08-09 22:08:51 · answer #9 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well I believe nobody should stamp Pres. Bush as terrorist, he can be called anything (Murderer, barbarian, cruel, maniac,.......) but certainly not a terrorist.
On the otherhand, Osama for some is a terrorist & for his followers a Hero. But what I think, he is still working for CIA.
2006-08-09 20:39:19 · answer #10 · answered by I-Rahi 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋