would you rather spend $60.00 on abercrombie pants or thirty on pants from fredy's???

Answer 1

$60 dollars on abercrombie pants plus that pretty cheep 2

Answer 2

Well, that depends on why you're buying the pants. Are you buying them because you like the style, or do you want everyone to see that you're wearing Abercrombie?

You can find the same style as the higher end retailers sell for much less, and still look great!

I personally love Forever21. They sell the same styles as you see on fashion runways and celebrities for a ton less, and I dont feel bad for only wearing it for a few times!

Answer 3

Abercrombie.

Answer 4

I would rather spend just a few dollars at either Value Village or Salvation Army and use the money for something else. I like those places better because I can almost guarantee that I don't have the same clothes as everyone else who shops at those stores (and that's the way I like it.)

Answer 5

Neither. I'll spend $50 at Lane Bryant. Their pants last me for an average of 4 years.... No one else's pants last anywhere near that long OR look as good.

Answer 6

between those i think fredy's (never been there though..) abercrombie are for rich people who dont know how to spend there money.

wear abercrombie if you want to look spoiled and stupid

Answer 7

abercrombie is waaayyy tooooo expensive...i still love it tho!!!! i'd rather get the pants at fredys.

Answer 8

Abercrombie. for sure. they are better quality. i haven't even heard of fredy's...

Answer 9

neither....

i get hand-me-down jeans from my bff!



i dont get why someone would spend that much money on jeans. They all look the same anywayz...

Answer 10

same quality.=Fredy's.
durr.
abercrombie is for preps with too much money.