*14th amendment: equal protection under the law (passed over 160 years ago) *roevwade: parental choice (passed in 1973) Now if you applied simple math: 14th + roe/wade = male parental choice. American males are having their rights violated daily and individual states are comminting financial extortion. But is that just ok since they know men will not stand up for their rights
2006-08-09 15:55:00 · 16 answers · asked by robwilson_4 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Face facts, men are done. I have seen men lose their jobs for making innocent compliments. I have seen men pay child support for kids that were not theirs. Did you know that through cloning women will be able to impregnate themselves with their own babies using skin cells? This is all true. There is a war being waged against men.
2006-08-09 16:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
An American Ban on something is particularly a lot a contradiction to most of the amendments accessible, yet even the judges contained in the utmost of courts refuse to amend this circumstances out of inner most style. i in my opinion do not imagine that woman circumcision (or maybe male circumcision) should be finished untill someone is eighteen, that's not the alternative of the mothers and fathers of a teenager to confirm a thanks to torture and malform their little ones, yet previous the age of 18, there could a minimum of be medical doctors who concentrate on those style of surgical operation so human beings a minimum of have the alternative at the same time as they're legally waiting to make it.
2016-11-23 18:37:09 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Males have the choice whether or not they wear a condom. If they choose to wave that right, then whether or not to have the resulting baby is the woman's choice, since the fetus is completely dependent on HER body to survive and uses HER resources. Unless the man is gonna carry the growing fetus for 9 months, he needs to shut the heck up.
2006-08-09 16:11:10 · answer #3 · answered by candy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Roa v wade is not about parental choice. Roe v wade is about a woman's right to control her own body. Men are irrelevent in that context.
2006-08-09 15:59:21 · answer #4 · answered by extton 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
roe v wade was about abortion and men usually don't excercise their rights, you have the choice of getting child custody and the financial earnings are split in half in between the two, same for gay couples.
2006-08-09 16:01:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think men's rights are being violated. The law always takes the side of women. Just look at child custody and child support.
2006-08-09 15:59:18 · answer #6 · answered by Stranger in a Strangeland 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Roe v. Wade is not about a womans right to control her own body. It's about her right to wallk away from her responsibility by murdering her own child! I know. My child was murdered in this fashion.
2006-08-09 16:05:07 · answer #7 · answered by jim h 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
LMAO, look like a simple misinterpretation to me. MEN HAVE rights trust me. just 90 percent of men choose not to excercise their rights. they give up because they dont want to deal with all the shim sham
2006-08-09 15:59:00 · answer #8 · answered by juicy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You had a choice whether or not to wear a condom. You didn't make the correct choice evidently, so you gave up that "right."
2006-08-09 16:01:55 · answer #9 · answered by tsopolly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe if people didn't jump into things so fast, as in abstinance, they wouldn't have to worry.
2006-08-09 16:01:30 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋