i hope someone can answer this, is a explanation of health care benifits a medical bill or what?

Answer 1

No, it's not a bill. It's explaining what your insurance paid and how much! :)

Answer 2

Ah, you have good answers already. I work for a large health insurance company, but I am not authorized to speak for them officially.

The explanation of benefits bears careful reading. Besides telling you what your insurance company is paying, it tells you why they aren't paying for something, too. This is important, if the reason sounds funny, call them up! Various glitches in the process can cause them to reject a claim that they shouldn't.

Also large insurance companies get discounts from providers, and sometimes the EOB will say that you should not have to pay something that was covered by an adjustment. If you later get a bill from the provider, make sure they are not trying to recover that adjustment. Most insurance companies are very helpful, you can call their customer service with any questions you have.

Answer 3

hi,no..an explanation from your health-care benefits provider is only a heads up on what they have paid for.It can however show what exactly they covered for you and you can see what the bill from the provider will be when it comes.If you have any questions about what it shows you may owe..you should contact your insurance company before you get the real bill and get the ball rolling in case there's a mistake.

Answer 4

No - An explanation of heathcare benefits (EOB) is usually sent to you by your insurance company to let you know how they processed the claim (paid it, denied it, paid part of it, etc). If there is any balance due (like a copay), it will state it on the EOB but it is up to the doctor to bill you for that amount (most likely you already paid it when you went to the office). Hope this helps!

Answer 5

i'm against it. i'm bored with listening to in regards to the "40 seven million human beings who don;t have scientific well-being coverage." I characterize the 253 million human beings who DO! and that i do no longer in hassle-free terms like the strategies-set that has been displayed by utilising the Democrats, that of "docs make too lots," or that the gov't would desire to tax well-being advantages, so as that "end clientele gets greater experience of the fee." this is rubbish. Like i'm Monopoly moneybags guy or Scrooge McDuck for having a midway respectable well-being plan from Anthem. i'm all 4 tweaking the gadget, because it does decide on tweaking. Recission is a unfavourable ingredient, and any scientific well-being coverage co. CEO whose enterprise does that practice would desire to be long previous after a similar way the gov't went after Enron and Bernie Maddoff. I even have faith we would desire to consistently cap malpractice awards, streamline drug approval methods so as that pharmaceuticals can decrease their expenditures, and if we do finally end up having a "public decision," it would in hassle-free terms be for people who can not get scientific well-being coverage any incorrect way. Tie it to unemployment advantages, for occasion, in for you to be on unemployment to be eligible for public well-being care. government intervention and administration won't artwork. Cf. the mastercard Reform Act - how's that goin'? somewhat, as my father found out at the instant, in case you ever decide directly to hearken to an indignant, 20-minute tirade out of your accepted practitioner, basically point out the interest Medicare. The gov't messed that up. Do you unquestionably need to shrink your well-being care to that time?

Answer 6

no it is and explanation of the benifits, it should say right on it. that this is not a bill