I would because Pat Robertson speaks and tells the truth and I would be honored if he was the mayor of my town.
2006-08-09 13:39:00 · 17 answers · asked by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I thought you were "Mr. Knowledge". You must be joking.
Alright, if I wanted a religious lunatic for a mayor, I absolutely would vote for him.
2006-08-09 13:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"When I said during my presidential bid that I would only bring Christians and Jews into the government, I hit a firestorm. `What do you mean?' the media challenged me. `You're not going to bring atheists into the government? How dare you maintain that those who believe in the Judeo-Christian values are better qualified to govern America than Hindus and Muslims?' My simple answer is, `Yes, they are.'" –Pat Robertson
"The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians." -- Pat Robertson
the guy is a bigot, hypocrite, and an overall nujob.
2006-08-09 13:53:16 · answer #2 · answered by runfaster 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh hell no. I would vote for Suddam before I voted for Pat Robertson.
2006-08-09 13:43:36 · answer #3 · answered by Salem 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Vote for him?? Are you freakin' kidding?!? The guy's a hate-mongering, sociopathic, lying hypocrite! I'd vote for Homer Simpson before that wacko, phony "Christian", nut-job Pat Robertson!
2006-08-09 13:43:00 · answer #4 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pat Robertson is good for one thing and one thing only - comic relief for sick and distorted minds. I refuse to believe you fit that catagory. Can you honestly tell me you believe all the garbage that comes out of his mouth?
2006-08-09 14:23:14 · answer #5 · answered by Sonie 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Heck no. Pat Robertson is a BIGOT.
2006-08-09 13:44:07 · answer #6 · answered by seattlecutiepie 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Mr. "The gays and the ACLU were responsible for 9/11" Robertson? What flavor koolaid are you getting at church? :\
2006-08-09 13:44:11 · answer #7 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No way....not in a million years, the guy is a raving lunatic. He gives Christians a bad name.
2006-08-09 13:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by mrselange 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sure, why not? He can't be any worse than most of the boobs that are mayors.
2006-08-09 13:44:41 · answer #9 · answered by sean1201 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No because religion and political office should be kept separate.
He either needs to have a profession as a religious leader or a politician. The combination of both is foul and corrupting in my opinion. thanks
2006-08-09 13:46:22 · answer #10 · answered by Tabor 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋