Or germ "theory", for that matter.
Apologizing in advance for any offense taken. (I'm cranky right now, and I haven't had my tea)
(there should be a "some" in the question too, but I ran out of room)
2006-08-09 13:33:32 · 6 answers · asked by faorie_arcana 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Well, we needed the Scopes trial in 1920 to circumvent
the irrationality of THAT period. Maybe now we need to
put Einstein and Newton and Galileo on trial to prove
gravity is real (no, they did try Galileo way back when).
Those who fail to learn from the errors of history are
condemned to repeat them.
2006-08-09 13:42:33 · answer #1 · answered by David Y 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not so much being against the teaching evolution, as being more for teaching of religion in a science curriculum.
2006-08-09 21:11:21 · answer #2 · answered by gshprd918 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG ... I LOVE that Friend episode where Febee argues with Ross over gravity ... finally, getting Ross to conceed that gravity MAY not exist after all. GigGgglLly GiIiGgggGggLLeEe.
2006-08-10 18:15:22 · answer #3 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually here is a very good article from the LA times with some of the latest discoveries. And while we know alot about gravity, we dont know everything - but smart people are working on it.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-gibbons22apr22,0,4223442.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
2006-08-09 20:38:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is not taught as being a theory.
2006-08-09 20:49:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't agree more with you ...I couldn't agree more with you :-)
2006-08-09 20:42:55 · answer #6 · answered by p.g 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋