2006-08-09 13:25:34 · 11 answers · asked by LoLa 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I, as a conservative, am very excited. Because now the Democrats will really see how out of touch they are when he gets the lowest amount of votes out of 3 parties.
It will be great come November.
Not to mention, this will pretty much secure a victory for the Republicans.
2006-08-09 13:31:16 · answer #1 · answered by Christopher 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's sad that the Dems stabbed Liberman in the back because he actually had a principled stand on Iraq. They made him out to be Bush's lap dog, which is a lie. It's good news for the Republicans, especially when the whole world saw Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton standing on stage behind Lamont.
The Dem party has been taken over by the loony left.
2006-08-09 20:56:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No one is mad that Ted won. But I do feel it will be a loss for the Dem. party in the long run. Playing with elections is becomming an art form. The last few elections is proof of that.
2006-08-10 00:36:01 · answer #3 · answered by Robert H 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Think about this! Joe wins as an Independent and the Dems win 49 seats. I that case the Reps are still the majority party because there would be two Inds., 49 Dems., 49 Reps., the tie breaker being the VP (don't you just love Chaney in a pinch).
2006-08-09 20:50:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not mad but disappointed. I thought democrats like diversity in their ranks. If Lamont won on anti-war, why didn't McKinney win her primary since she is anti-war to hilt. I don't get it. Conn. people will see the error of their ways and back good old Joe.
2006-08-09 20:33:22 · answer #5 · answered by tjc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Joe is a phony democrat who has done nothing but give aid and comfort to the Republicans. He considers questioning the President in time of war, as if democracies are ever at peace in all of history from their adversaries, essentially treason, which is muddle headed nonsense. He needs to kiss up to the Republicans he supports, where he can find a future. Better a real Republican than a trojan horse.
2006-08-09 20:41:57 · answer #6 · answered by Noitall 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I completely agree with Christopher! Go Republicans!!! I only wish GW could run again, in fact, let's vote in Laura Bush! She would make a much better 1st woman pres than that slug Rod-Ham!
2006-08-09 20:36:22 · answer #7 · answered by Mark MacIver 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He won the battle. Will he win the war? That is up for some serious debate.
2006-08-09 20:30:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a joyous occasion by all counts...Dem's shoot themselves in the foot once again....in the 70's their ant-war stance was just the beginning of their spiraling descent, showing once again their avoidance of national security.
2006-08-09 20:44:37 · answer #9 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, he shook both parties up and we can only hope they can get back on track and start helping bring this country together.
2006-08-09 20:34:10 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋