For example 90 minutes, or 120 minutes or only 60 minutes? and why?
2006-08-09 12:45:28 · 5 answers · asked by serkornel 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
To be honest, as long as it takes to tell the story...
WAY to many hands in a movie, that's why some movies are cut up in the editing room....
If those Movie Exec would stay out, then movies would be alot better, yes they would be longer but you can make intermissions like in the old movies..... My Fair Lady, The King and I
anyway hope that helped :)
2006-08-09 13:01:10 · answer #1 · answered by truthfinder1960 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the movie and storyline. U don't want a movie that tries to squeeze a 90 min story in to 60 minutes, but u also don't want one that tries to stretch 60 mins worth of movie into 90mins. Most movies have the right times for their stories, as long as u enjoy it, it doesn't matter.
2006-08-09 20:07:15 · answer #2 · answered by bobatemydog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
90 min to 120. It would have to be a good movie like Lord of the Rings to be any longer.
2006-08-09 20:05:30 · answer #3 · answered by Sweet T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like to watch movies from 90 min to 180 & I don't mind longer cause there is movies that you don't want them to end. but any movie less then 90 min I think it would be silly.
ex. Th Da Vinci Code I would prefer it if its longer cause they ignore a lot of things that came in the book & the movie wasn't as intersted as the book.
2006-08-09 20:38:52 · answer #4 · answered by Banana Happy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
90mins...that's perfect...
2006-08-09 19:51:23 · answer #5 · answered by Liz S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋